ThomasNet News Logo
Sign Up | Log In | ThomasNet Home | Promote Your Business

IPC comments on European Parliament's Environment Committee decision.

Print | 
Email |  Comment   Share  
June 16, 2010 - IPC was disappointed at European Parliament's Environment Committee vote to include broad families of chemicals, such as organobromines, in Annex III for priority assessment. Of specific concern was how process outlined in amendments approved today does not define rigorous scientific methodology. According to Fern Abrams of IPC, proposed process could "lead to additional substance restrictions that provide neither environmental nor human health benefits."

European Parliament Environment Committee Vote Puts TBBPA on Priority Assessment List


(Archive News Story - Products mentioned in this Archive News Story may or may not be available from the manufacturer.)

IPC-Association Connecting Electronics Industries
3000 Lakeside Drive
Bannockburn, IL, 60015
USA



Press release date: June 2, 2010

IPC Continues Advocacy for Rigorous Scientific Assessment

BANNOCKBURN, Ill., USA - IPC - Association Connecting Electronics Industries® today expressed disappointment in the vote by the European Parliament's Environment Committee to include broad families of chemicals, such as organobromines, in Annex III for priority assessment. While an outright ban of these chemicals has been averted in this vote, the committee's decision falls far short of supporting a rigorous scientific assessment that would ensure protection of the environment and human health.

IPC is concerned that the process outlined in the amendments approved today does not define a rigorous scientific methodology. The proposed process "lacks a rigorous scientific methodology and could therefore lead to additional substance restrictions that provide neither environmental nor human health benefits," says Fern Abrams, IPC director of environmental policy and government relations.

The inclusion of broad families of chemicals, such as all organobromines, for priority assessment under Annex III is impractical and unscientific. While some organobromines, such as polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs), have been identified as toxic, restricted under the RoHS Directive and voluntarily withdrawn from the market, other organobromines, such as TBBPA, have been found to be safe for human health and the environment by both the World Health Organization and the European Commission Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER).

In direct lobbying efforts over the past year, IPC has urged the European Union to amend the RoHS Directive to introduce rigorous scientific methodology aligned with the comprehensive chemicals evaluations under the REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) regulation.

IPC continues to lobby to ensure the RoHS revision's process reflects sound scientific methodology. IPC's white paper, "Recasting the RoHS Directive: An Opportunity to Solidify its Scientific Basis in Support of Comprehensive Environmental Regulation," advocates for a revised RoHS to be based on sound science and fully aligned with the REACH methodology for substance restrictions.

The European Parliament is currently scheduled to vote in July on the Environment Committee's recommendations for recasting the RoHS Directive. The Environment Committee is also scheduled to vote on the related Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive later this month, with a plenary vote to take place in July.

About IPC IPC (www.IPC.org) is a global trade association based in Bannockburn, Ill., dedicated to the competitive excellence and financial success of its 2,700 member companies which represent all facets of the electronics industry, including design, printed board manufacturing, electronics assembly and test. As a member-driven organization and leading source for industry standards, training, market research and public policy advocacy, IPC supports programs to meet the needs of an estimated $1.7 trillion global electronics industry. IPC maintains additional offices in Taos, N.M.; Arlington, Va.; Garden Grove, Calif.; Stockholm, Sweden; Moscow, Russia; and Shanghai and Shenzhen, China.
Print | 
Email |  Comment   Share  
Contacts: View detailed contact information.


 

Post a comment about this story

Name:
E-mail:
(your e-mail address will not be posted)
Comment title:
Comment:
To submit comment, enter the security code shown below and press 'Post Comment'.
 



 See related product stories
More .....
 Visit Green and Clean Blog
  Latest from the Green and Clean Blog
 See more product news in:
Services
Green & Clean
 More New Product News from this company:
Scientific RoHS Revision Decision was praised by IPC.
More ....
| Featured Manufacturing Jobs
 Other News from this company:
IPC Releases IPC-1755, Conflict Minerals Data Exchange Standard
Six Industry Volunteers Receive IPC President's Award
IPC Crowns Winner of Hand Soldering World Championship
IPC and ITI to Host Seminars on Critical and Emerging Product Environmental Requirements
Volunteers Honored for Contributions to Electronics Industry and IPC
More ....
 Tools for you
Watch Company 
View Company Profile
Company web site
More news from this company
E-mail this story to a friend
Save Story
Search for suppliers of
Trade Associations


Home  |  My ThomasNet News®  |  Industry Market Trends®  |  Submit Release  |  Advertise  |  Contact News  |  About Us
Brought to you by Thomasnet.com        Browse ThomasNet Directory

Copyright © 2014 Thomas Publishing Company. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy



Error close

Please enter a valid email address