Nuclear Power Plants: Good or Bad?

nuclear power plants good or bad

Nuclear energy refers to the energy harnessed from nuclear fission reactions. Unlike a conventional power plant, which uses the combustion of fossil fuel (such as coal or natural gas) for heat generation, a nuclear power plant uses the heat generated from a controlled nuclear fission reaction.

Typically, uranium-235 (U-235), a radioactive isotope of uranium, is used as fuel, and another radioactive material, such as a Californium-252 (Cf-252) neutron source, is used in nuclear reactors to start and sustain the nuclear fission process.

Such power plants make up a significant share of total electricity generation across many different countries. For example, France generates 75% of its electricity from nuclear power plants, while the United States uses nuclear energy to supply nearly 20% of its electricity requirements.

While there are various environmental and safety concerns associated with nuclear-based energy generation, it’s safe to say that nuclear power plants will remain a major player in the energy sector going forward.

The Argument: Nuclear Energy Is Good

Is nuclear energy good? Nuclear power offers a range of unique features and benefits.

For example, nuclear energy has a very low lifecycle carbon footprint; fossil fuels consumed for electricity and heat generation are the single largest contributors of greenhouse emissions, and nuclear energy provides a reliable method for electricity generation without contributing to global warming. The same technology also makes nuclear energy less polluting in the conventional sense, as nuclear power plants do not produce dangerous gaseous emissions.

Industry experts will have other examples at the ready to illustrate why nuclear power plants are good. For example, nuclear power is often cheaper than conventional fossil fuel-based power and does not depend on the volatile fossil-fuel market.

Nuclear power plants are also more reliable than conventional fossil-fuel plants, and, when compared to other low-emission energy sources like wind and solar, offer much higher efficiency. These power plants take up less space than traditional ones while allowing for the same power capacity.

Finally, radioactive materials, including neutron sources such as Cf-252, can now be much more safely transported and shipped anywhere in the world. Improvements in storage technology have allowed for much safer nuclear energy generation processes in general.

The Argument: Nuclear Power Is Bad

As with any type of energy source, nuclear energy does have its drawbacks. The consequences of an accident, however unlikely, can be devastating and far-reaching. What some would say are bad uses of nuclear energy, such as those involved in military operations, could be catastrophic.

Additionally, nuclear waste must be able to be stored safely for a significant amount of time. While nuclear energy generation is cost-effective, the disposal and storage of nuclear waste are time-consuming, expensive processes. However, nuclear waste disposal is greatly improving as developments continue to emerge.

Finally, because it is a relatively safe, reliable energy source that does not contribute to global warming or depend on fossil fuels, it is essential that this energy source is utilized to its full potential — but this is not always the case.

Looking Ahead

The use of nuclear power for energy reaction is a complex process, with many unique advantages and disadvantages. However, the environmental concerns associated with nuclear energy — such as the shipping of radioactive materials and neutrino sources and the storage of nuclear waste — are now being addressed more effectively thanks to various technological advances and innovations.

The ability to more safely and efficiently contain and ship nuclear material is making this reliable, emission-free technology a more viable option every day.

Image Credit: Wlad74 /

Lockheed Tasked with Modernizing Launch Control SystemNext Story »