Reports: Global Clean-Tech, Renewable Energy Markets Expand
A pair of recently released reports indicates robust global growth in both the renewable energy industry and clean-tech equipment, which was defined as components and finished products in renewable energy, energy efficiency and e-mobility markets.
According to a United Nations report, global investment in renewable energy in 2011 reached $257 billion, with solar energy representing more than half of the spending. At $147 billion, solar energy spending grew by 52 percent year-over-year in 2011. This was fueled mostly by demand for photovoltaic (PV) equipment.
However, the U.N. report also indicates that the solar power industry is maturing, highlighting the demise of a slew of manufacturers. It also states that aggressive Chinese manufacturers have eroded market prices for PV modules by 50 percent.
China has grown into a juggernaut in both renewable energy and clean-tech equipment production. The third annual “Clean Economy, Living Planet” report by the WWF shows that the country unseated the European Union last year as the leading maker of clean-tech equipment when measured by sales value, at $71.7 billion. According to the U.N. report, China accounted for one-fifth of global renewable energy spending, at $52 billion. That spending was tops in the world, too, just nudging by U.S. investment of $51 billion.
The U.N. based its report on combined spending in the solar, wind, geothermal, biomass and hydro sectors. Wind power investment reached $84 billion, or 12 percent of all renewable energy spending. The $257 billion total investment for 2011 represents a 17 percent year-over-year rise.
Even though that figure still makes up less than 20 percent of overall global energy volume, dominated by fossil-fuel energy, it compelled U.N. Under-Secretary-General and U.N. Environmental Programme Executive Director Achim Steiner to say that the trends in renewable energy “are real, substantive and transformative.”
Steiner made the remark roughly a week ahead of the Rio+20 summit on sustainable development, which will take place in Rio de Janeiro.
In its report on clean energy technology products, the WWF not only tabulated sales value data on wind, solar, biomass, hydro and geothermal power equipment but crunched numbers on energy-efficiency equipment (fuel cells, LED and CFL lighting, heat pumps, insulation, micro combined heat and power) and e-mobility equipment (electric power trains, batteries, power electronics).
It concluded that overall global sales value of clean-tech equipment grew by 10 percent to almost $251.2 billion. The organization also ranked 40 countries based on their 2011 sales values of clean-tech equipment. It determined that the five fastest-growing equipment manufacturing hubs were Taiwan, China, India, South Korea and the United States.
“The report shows that clean-tech manufacturing is a great business opportunity and an essential element for getting onto a sustainable development path,” noted Jason Anderson, head of climate and energy policy at the WWF European Policy Office.























It is amazing, even disturbing, that we continue to see these articles suggesting that wind and solar make sense OR have any significant part of our energy future. This is public relations at its worst. OF COURSE those getting enormous government subsidies want them to continue, but that misses the point. Math is required here. Have wind and solar made a measurable difference in our energy mix and have they helped to reduce C02 emissions?
No. Not at all. It has been a huge disappointment and waste of public funds. We are just beginning to learn that developers make money when the deal is done, not based on performance. This sounds a lot like sub-prime mortgages.
I think we all need to start telling the truth – especially journalists.
Solar and wind schemes have not reduced CO2 emissions and they have only raised electricity rates. “Energy farming” (wind and solar) will NEVER replace coal (or oil) and they are simply an over-priced supplements, not “alternatives.” Incentives gave people false hopes about solving the problem and we are now beginning to learn the truth. Polls demonstrate that nearly 60% of Americans “believe solar will replace our dependence on oil,” yet it is impossible.
Despite significant subsidies in the last 5 years ($1 trillion worldwide) wind and solar are less than 2% of our total electricity generation (solar is .1%). Plus, because they are unreliable any attempt to accept their unpredictable electricity generation requires us to ramp down our base load electricity generation, creating additional costs and more CO2. This 2% addition of renewables hasn’t changed CO2 emissions at all – even new demand has been 3X wind and solar. These schemes have made NO difference at all.
Cheerleading for wind and solar might extend the incentives, but it won’t solve the energy problem. We need clean, affordable electricity.
My work is here: http://www.solutioneur.com