Humidity Analyzer monitors moisture in gases.
November 28, 2001 - Model rh-plus MR 2350 relative humidity analyzer makes readings of 0-100%RH over temperatures of –15 to 85º C. Outputs are 0-20mA or 4-20mA, with system alarm relay and three adjustable relays with SPDT 2.5A contact. It has selectable failsafe mode, two-line LCD, and membrane-type pushbuttons for unit selection, ranges, setpoints, and special functions. Optional input permits external sensors for pressure compensation, and temperature.
(Archive News Story - Products mentioned in this Archive News Story may or may not be available from the manufacturer.)
Original Press release
General Eastern
20 Commerce Way
Woburn, MA, 01801
USA
New rh-plus Analyzer Measures & Controls Relative Humidity in Gases
Woburn, MA - General Eastern Instruments introduces the rh-plus MR 2350 relative humidity (rh) analyzer for measurement and control of moisture levels in gases. An optional input permits external sensors for pressure compensation, temperature or other parameters. Its two-line LCD display and membrane-type pushbuttons control unit selection, ranges, setpoints and special functions.
The Model MR 2350 is available in both wall and panel mount configurations. When used with the MDR3 Humidity Probe, the unit is capable of rh readings in the range of 0-100% over a temperature range of –15ºC to +85ºC. Current output is 0-20mA or 4-20mA and the unit includes a system alarm relay, three adjustable relays with SPDT 2.5A contacts, selectable failsafe mode and adjustable hysteresis.
The analyzer is approved as intrinsically safe for use in hazardous areas by Cenelec and FM when used with approved Zener barriers. Applications include clean rooms, food/pharmaceutical processing and storage, ETO sterilizers, medical air and refrigerant dryers, heat treating, leak testing and a host of other applications. |
|
User comments about this story
2350 humidity analyser
Dear Sir
LOOKING TO PURCHASE A 2350 GE HUMIDITY ANALYZER ARE YOU ABLE TO HELP
MANY THANKS
SANDY.
By Sandy Smith on Oct 17, 2012 08:56
Reply to this comment
|
|
|
|
|
|
