SDOs and Consortia gather for standards developers forum.July 11, 2007 -
ANSI-accredited SDOs and consortia met in Boston during the 2007 Open Forum for Standards Developers, Global Standard Setting 2007: An Interactive Discussion. In his opening remarks, Andy Updegrove revealed that SDOs and consortia face common issues. The forum included panels focusing on various IPR-related issues of the standards setting process, as well as on challenges that traditional/nontraditional standards-setting organizations face as they seek recognition.
SDOs, Consortia Gather for 2007 Open Forum for Standards Developers
(Archive News Story - Products mentioned in this Archive News Story may or may not be available from the manufacturer.)
American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
11 West 42nd St., 13th Flr.
New York, NY, 10036
Press release date: June 25, 2007
On June 20, ANSI-accredited standards developing organizations (SDOs) and consortia gathered in Boston for the 2007 Open Forum for Standards Developers, Global Standard Setting 2007: An Interactive Discussion. The highly interactive event was the third in a series of ANSI-sponsored forums to foster open exchange among various types of standards-setting organizations (SSOs) on matters of common concern. This year's forum saw a marked increase in the number of consortia representatives, some of whom participated on behalf of multiple consortia groups.
In his opening remarks, Andy Updegrove, partner, Gesmer Updegrove LLP and chair of the ANSI Consortium Outreach Group, dispelled common myths and misperceptions regarding SDOs and consortia, revealing that despite certain basic differences, the two types of organizations share more similarities than generally thought. Intellectual property rights (IPR) issues, achieving global recognition of their work products, and the challenges of serving a broad spectrum of industries are chief priorities common to both.
"Providing an open and neutral forum where all voices can be heard is a top priority of ANSI," said Joe Bhatia, ANSI president and CEO. "Every single organization represented here today - including ANSI - is a global entity, whether in membership, scope, reach, or impact. I have a very specific interest in learning how ANSI and its broad-based constituencies - both here and abroad - can utilize our competencies and connections to support what your respective organizations are trying to accomplish."
The first panel of the day gave focus to various IPR-related issues that can arise during the standards-setting process. Panel moderator Earl Nied-program director of standards at Intel Corporation and chair of the ANSI Patent Group-emphasized that the appropriate use of intellectual property rights can stimulate innovative technologies and market competition in ways that facilitate the adoption and implementation of standards. Presenters from WilmerHale and Bingham McCutchen, LLP led attendees through a discussion of current developments relating to ex ante disclosure of terms (i.e., before technology is locked-in to a standard) and the pros and cons of early patent disclosure. There was recognition that ANSI, via its Patent Group, provides a forum where patent issues are debated, and that currently consortia groups are not widely represented.
Introducing the topic of patent issues at the international level, Amy Marasco, general manager of standards strategy at Microsoft, highlighted key aspects of the new harmonized patent policy adopted by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) last March.
The second panel, chaired by Ron Silletti, corporate program director of standards at IBM, examined the challenges that both traditional and non-traditional standards-setting organizations face as they seek to build worldwide recognition of their standards and specifications. Presenters from the Web Services Interoperability Organization (WS-1), the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS), and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) discussed their respective strategies for increasing international reach, global participation, and acceptance.
During a luncheon discussion, Robert W. Noth, chairman of the ANSI Board of Directors, explained that one of ANSI's primary reasons for convening open forums is to learn from all constituents how the Institute can better serve the needs of the broad standards community. Underscoring ANSI's commitment to continue these forums on a regular basis, he emphasized that the Institute continually examines new ways and technologies to support standards-setting organizations operating in the U.S. and abroad.
A panel chaired by Kavi Corporation's director of strategic consulting Karl Best gave voice to the various challenges that SSOs face as businesses operating in today's marketplace. To succeed, SSOs require profitable financial business models that support their standards missions. Panelists from ASTM International, the Open Geospatial Consortium, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), USB Implementers Forum, and Virtual, Inc., discussed their organizations' strategies for diversifying revenue streams, capitalizing on growth opportunities, delivering timely, market-driven standards, and engaging member participation.
During a final wrap-up session, participants highlighted the value of the forum's dialogue and networking opportunities, and recommended that ANSI plan further sessions on an annual or bi-annual basis. Their written responses to several key questions raised at the conclusion of the event will help to shape future ANSI programs.