Revenue Recognition Principles impact biotech industry.

Press Release Summary:



According to independent study conducted by Glass, Lewis, and Co., LLC, current revenue recognition accounting principles continue to place unnecessary challenges on small and medium-sized biotechnology companies who enter into collaborative arrangements. Uncertainty underlying current revenue recognition principles have caused many biotechnology companies to restate their financial statements, which can shake confidence in reliability of company's financial prospects.



Original Press Release:



Revenue Recognition Principles Negatively Impact the Biotechnology Industry, New Study Confirms



WASHINGTON, D.C. (October 10, 2008) - Current revenue recognition accounting principles continue to place unnecessary challenges on small and medium-sized biotechnology companies who enter into collaborative arrangements, according to an independent study released today by the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO). The study, entitled "Revenue Recognition for Collaborative Arrangements in the Biotechnology Industry, was conducted by Glass, Lewis, & Co., LLC, a leading research and professional services firm.

"This analysis affirms the need for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Services Accounting Board (FASB) to clarify revenue recognition accounting principles," said Alan Eisenberg, Executive Vice President for Emerging Companies and Business Development at BIO. "Collaborative arrangements are key financing mechanisms for small and medium-sized biotechnology companies and clearer guidance from the SEC and FASB would allow more critical resources to be dedicated to new research for life saving medicines rather than accounting concerns."

"Lack of clarity in collaboration revenue recognition principles extended our IPO timeline by months - and resulted in financial reports that are unclear to investors," said Paul Cleveland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affymax, a company whose initial public offering was delayed while the company evaluated its revenue recognition for joint steering committees. "Clear and consistent revenue recognition principles would facilitate fundraising and enhance investor understanding of biotech companies' financial results, potentially accelerating drug development efforts."

Collaborative arrangements typically involve a small biotechnology company and a larger company that agree to share technology and research costs. This mechanism allows both entities to access additional funding and commercialization networks, while sharing the costs of bringing important medical therapies to market. Biotechnology research and development costs between $800 million and $1.2 billion over eight to 12 years to bring a biopharmaceutical to market - an enormous investment that makes collaborative arrangements both common and critical to finding treatments and cures.

According to the study, the uncertainty underlying current revenue recognition principles have caused many biotechnology companies to restate their financial statements, which can shake confidence in the reliability of the company's financial prospects. Most importantly, a restatement can divert a company's focus away from the primary task at hand - new research and development.

The study further found that similar aspects of collaboration arrangements are accounted for in different ways. The differences make for wide variations in the timing of revenue recognized in the income statement, resulting in confusion for both investors and regulators. Due to the lack of clarity from regulators, companies choose different periods over which to defer and amortize revenue based on their evaluation of the collaborative efforts they perform. For example, the amortization period for companies reviewed for the study ranged from 18 months to more than 18 years.

The study is available at www.bio.org/tax/funding/revenuerecognitionprinciplesstudy.pdf

Upcoming BIO Events

Intellectual Property Counsels' Committee Fall Conference and Meeting

October 20-22, 2008

Orlando, Fla.

BIO HR Conference 2008

October 26-28, 2008

San Diego, Calif.

BIO-LES Advanced Business Development Course

October 27-29, 2008

San Francisco, Calif.

BIO Investor Forum 2008

October 29-31, 2008

San Francisco, Calif.

Advanced Business Development Course

November 14-16, 2008

Mannheim/Heidelberg, Germany

BIO-Europe 2008

November 17-19, 2008

Mannheim/Heidelberg, Germany

BIO National Venture Conference

March 31 - April 1, 2008

Boston, Mass.

2009 BIO International Convention

May 18-21, 2009

Atlanta, Ga.

About BIO

BIO represents more than 1,200 biotechnology companies, academic institutions, state biotechnology centers and related organizations across the United States and in more than 30 other nations. BIO members are involved in the research and development of innovative healthcare, agricultural, industrial and environmental biotechnology products. BIO also produces the BIO International Convention, the world's largest gathering of the biotechnology industry, along with industry-leading investor and partnering meetings held around the world.

Contact:

Contact Ellen Dadisman

202/312-9299

All Topics