Quantcast
 
Search for: Search what?
  

 Newsletters
Industry Market Trends
Get our free bi-weekly Industry Market Trends newsletter delivered by e-mail.
Subscribe    View Sample

Product News Alerts
Get customized, daily news on the products and services you want to know about.
Subscribe   View Sample
 Recent Entries
 Archives by Year
 Recommended Reading
book10.6b.JPG

Hardcover, 272pp
Harvard Business Press, September 2009
ISBN-13: 9781422126691
Read more


 Blogroll
Advertisement

« Job Opportunities for Military Veterans | Main | Industrial Production Slows in October »


November 18, 2009

How Union Membership Has Changed Over 25 Years

By David R. Butcher

Unions today are composed of a greater share of women, Hispanics, Asian Pacific Americans and more-educated workers, according to new data that also indicate a shift in unionized labor away from manufacturing toward services.

Around the middle of the last century, labor unions represented about a third of all American workers. Since then, the United States labor movement has undergone major changes, particularly in recent years, not the least of which has been shrinking membership.

The union membership rate in the U.S. has fallen from 20.1 percent of employed wage and salary workers in 1983 to 12.4 percent in 2008, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS) latest union members summary, which reports that there are 16.1 million workers belonging to a union in the U.S., down from 17.7 million in 1983.

The dwindling membership base is not the only dramatically changing element of unionized labor across the nation.

A new study from the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), a progressive not-for-profit research center, points to a number of demographic shifts that have taken place over the last two-and-a-half decades.

The left-leaning think tank's report, titled The Changing Face of Labor, 1983-2008, analyzes trends in the union workforce over the last quarter century and reveals that it is more diverse today than it was just 25 years ago.

"The view that the typical union worker is a white male manufacturing worker may have been correct a quarter of a century ago, but it's not an accurate description of those in today's labor movement," according to John Schmitt, a senior economist with the CEPR and an author of the report.

The new data indicates, among other demographic changes, a shift away from unionized manufacturing toward unionized services, particularly within the public sector.

In 2008, only one in 10 union members worked in manufacturing, down from nearly three in 10 in 1983. Five in 10 union workers were in the public sector last year, and the remaining four out of 10 were in the private sector outside manufacturing, according to the CEPR.

Within the public sector, local government workers — including many workers in several heavily unionized occupations, such as teacher, police officers and firefighter — have the highest union membership rate (42.2 percent), according to the BLS.

Meanwhile, the share of manufacturing workers in the unionized workforce has been rapidly declining. The CEPR report says that 12.2 percent of manufacturing workers were unionized in 2008, down significantly from the 30.3 percent of manufacturing workers who were unionized in 1983.

Among all occupational groups, workers in education, training and library fields have the highest unionization rate (38.7 percent), followed by protective service occupations (35.4 percent), according to the BLS's 2008 data. Sales and related occupations (3.3 percent) and farming, fishing and forestry occupations (4.3 percent) have the lowest.

Another point the CEPR makes clear is that unionized workers have much more formal education today than they did in the early 1980s. "In 1983, union workers were slightly less educated than the overall workforce," the report says. "By 2008, union workers were slightly more educated than the overall workforce."

Today, more than one-third of union workers have at least a four-year college degree, up from only one in five in 1983.

The CEPR report points to a number of other key union findings. Among them:

  • Immigrants represented 12.6 percent of union members in 2008, up from 8.4 percent in 1994;
  • Latino workers, the fastest-growing ethnic group in the labor movement, represented 12.2 percent of the union workforce last year, up from 5.8 percent in 1983;
  • Asian workers have also made considerable gains, composing 4.6 percent of the union workforce in 2008, up from 2.5 percent in 1989; and
  • Black workers represented about 13 percent of the total unionized workforce last year, a share that has held relatively steady since 1983.

Some of the developments reflect changes in the broader U.S. workforce, which, for instance, also has more women in it today.

In fact, women are on track to constitute the majority of union workers by 2020, according to the CEPR report. Women represented more than 45 percent of unionized workers in 2008, up from 35 percent in 1983. Almost half (49.4 percent) of unionized women had at least a four-year college degree in 2008.

The percentage of men in unions has dropped to 14.5 percent in 2008 from 27.7 percent in 1983.

The typical union member is 45 years old, compared with 41 for the typical American worker. The age for both the typical union member and the typical worker is now seven years older than it was a quarter-century ago.

According to the study, the most heavily unionized age group was workers aged 55 to 64, with 18.4 percent of them in unions. The least unionized age group was 16- to 24-year-olds — 5.7 percent were in unions.


Resources

Union Members Summary: Union Members in 2008
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Jan. 28, 2009

The Changing Face of Labor, 1983-2008
by John Schmitt and Kris Warner
The Center for Economic and Policy Research, Nov. 10, 2009

Demographics of the Labor Movement Shift Considerably Over the Past 25 Years
The Center for Economic and Policy Research, Nov. 10, 2009


| Add to Y!MyWeb | Digg it | Add to Slashdot

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://news.thomasnet.com/mt41/mt-tb.cgi/2195




Advertisement


Comment

5 Comments

Staber said:

If the face of unions continues to mimic that of the corrupt SEIU, it will be no wonder that young folks will steer clear. Unions are already concerned about the fall off of union membership in the younger demographic. The issue is not union, yes or no. It is the means by which they employ heavy-handed extreme leftist Saul Alinsky tactics that will be their undoing.

November 18, 2009 2:46 PM


ras said:

Shrinking membership is why there is a mad rush toward government-run health care. With shrinking membership and job losses, unions have a big health care nut they promised their members. Since they will not meet their long-term obligations, they want to pass their nut on to government-run health care, which means we will be paying their obligations through increased taxes. The 80% of us who are not union will get the bill. Unions as they are presently constituted are not good for America. It is time for us non-union voters to make changes in Washington.

November 18, 2009 4:10 PM


Edward Sparks said:

The unions have so intently been pursuing taxes being put one each share of stock sold. I personally think since the unions have so intently benefited through the Stimulus Package, from the standpoint of keeping their jobs, they should pay at a minimum of $5.00 per member pr month. They are so intent that government needs our tax money, they should be the first in line to help the government. Between private and government union members, that might start making a tiny dent in this runaway government spend. Stand up to the plate, before trying to spend other peoples money.

November 18, 2009 8:28 PM


Tony Evangelista said:

THe unions are what made the middle class of this country and the middle class is what makes this country great. End of story.

November 22, 2009 12:53 PM


Roy Faust said:

This is a bad piece of work. The conclusions you makes from this, unless you knew a little about the work-force, would be wrong.

First, the word diversity should not be used. It only indicates the lack of understanding and leftist views. And if you could apply the word diversity, years ago those diverse workers were not employeed in those traditional white male jobs nor were they a measurable amount of the work force.

Second, education is used and applied wrong. The education and skill level of a particular job doesn't change over time. The quality of education does. As unions get more involved in education, quality of that education is sacrifised, as in any other union job. Most business, that I know, will under no cercomstances trust a high school deploma. They will give you a basic reading, writing, and math test just to get you in the door for an interview. And further, all those institutions of higher learning, are putting out grads that cannot get employment in their field of study. This causes them to settle for lessor skilled union jobs.

Third, public employees are in unions due to the democrat leadership buying election votes, period.

Fourth, if one would make a fair study into the unions, there are two main organizing groups, organized crime and the USSR. Organized crime wanted control over the workers for many reasons. From using the organized workers as strong-arm soldiers, to legally extorting income from businesses. Union dues is a second layer of taxes on the workers. The USSR had used unions as a way to control workers here in our country, and using the union dues to fund their other Anti-American activities.

During the last 50 years, union workers have been the biggest suckers in American history. All at the cost to their employers. It's like articles like this that try to white-wash and legitimize todays unions using meaningless numbers and tags falsely.

You people need to write articles on manufacturing, machines, part, supplies, and leave the employees to the companies that employe them. It is clear you don't have a clue. I will leave with one more statement, minimum wage came from the child labor laws protecting child workers from wage abuse. Any real job that requires a real worker is paid a fair wage, not child wages (minimum wage). Unionism is communism.

November 23, 2009 3:59 PM




Leave a comment

 












Type the characters you see in the picture above.


 
 


Brought to you by Thomasnet.com        Browse ThomasNet Directory

Copyright © 2010 Thomas Publishing Company
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy