Quantcast
 
Search for: Search what?
  

 Newsletters
Industry Market Trends
Get our free bi-weekly Industry Market Trends newsletter delivered by e-mail.
Subscribe    View Sample

Product News Alerts
Get customized, daily news on the products and services you want to know about.
Subscribe   View Sample
 Recent Entries
 Archives by Year
 Recommended Reading
HealthyEmployeesCover.JPG

Book with CD, 350pp
NOLO, October 2009
ISBN-13: 9781413310740
Read more


 Blogroll
Advertisement

« Make Operational Improvements Stick in the New Year | Main | The Year Ahead for the (Newly) Unemployed »


January 6, 2009

National Infrastructure Takes Center Stage

By David R. Butcher

President-elect Barack Obama recently called for a broad economic recovery plan that aims to create at least 2.5 million jobs, largely through infrastructure development. Will we finally start making headway toward fixing the nation's infrastructure?

In its most recent Infrastructure Report Card, the American Society of Civil Engineers estimated the nation's infrastructure needs at a staggering $1.6 trillion over five years.

"Despite considerable new revenue commitments by local governments, which out-pace state and federal government efforts, the nation's infrastructure needs — both preservation of existing assets and system expansions — are growing much faster than public resource commitments," the United States Conference of Mayors noted in August.

Soon after November's record-low drop in housing starts, President-elect Barack Obama spoke of expanding the scope of his economic recovery plan and seeking to create or save 3 million jobs in the next two years. Little more than a week ago, an Obama adviser told CBS' Face the Nation that the emerging plan could cost "$675 billion to $775 billion" — up from a $600 billion estimate House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) gave two weeks prior.

As part of his broad plan to revive a flailing economy, Obama's administration will focus on five main areas of spending and tax breaks: infrastructure, health, education, energy and support for the poor and the unemployed.

The infrastructure-rebuilding plan is likely to be a major part of his economic stimulus package, which could include potentially hundreds of billions of dollars for infrastructure projects.

Last month, Obama pledged to "create millions of jobs by making the single largest new investment in our national infrastructure since the creation of the federal highway system in the 1950s."

The sorts of jobs the incoming U.S. president proposes to create involve construction work on roads, mass transit projects, weatherization of government buildings and installation of information technology in medical facilities, among others. By investing heavily in our national infrastructure, jobs should be created for building, repairing, upgrading and maintaining public infrastructure — protecting our investment. Federal dollars spent to create these jobs should quickly begin giving back to the economy.

The National Air Transport Association, which represents aviation businesses, said $30 billion spent on transportation infrastructure alone would create or sustain 834,000 jobs. (Source: USA Today)

(The construction sector, including the many professions and fields associated with it, makes up one of the larger components of the U.S. economy. For 2007, the U.S. Bureau of Labor estimates that 7.6 million Americans worked in construction alone. Imagine the number of jobs created and sustained if tens of billions of dollars were newly put into redeveloping the nation's bridges, roads, transit, dams and levees, airports, waterways, et al.)

At a press conference last month, Obama gave a few more details about his plan for federal spending toward infrastructure, pledging that the program would go beyond "roads and bridges" to other programs with long-term payoffs for taxpayers.

That list included the now-familiar broadband Internet build-out, getting medical records into electronic form and making our economy more energy efficient ("creating a new energy economy").

In his Dec. 6 radio address on the economy, Obama stated:

[W]e will launch a massive effort to make public buildings more energy-efficient. Our government now pays the highest energy bill in the world. We need to change that. We need to upgrade our federal buildings by replacing old heating systems and installing efficient light bulbs. ... [M]y economic recovery plan will launch the most sweeping effort to modernize and upgrade school buildings that this country has ever seen. We will repair broken schools, make them energy-efficient, and put new computers in our classrooms.

Obama's advocacy of a historic infrastructure spending plan has drawn forth no shortage of groups looking for some of that funding. "Big business, including the steel industry, is lining up to support President-elect Barack Obama's plan to stimulate the economy with the biggest spending spree on roads, bridges and other infrastructure projects since the Dwight D. Eisenhower administration," Purchasing.com reports.

In the lead-up to this month's debate on whether to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to revive the economy, the National Governors Association identified $136 billion in infrastructure projects it says should be in the stimulus. The association's list consists mostly of transit construction but also includes port expansions and renewable energy programs. Likewise, last month the U.S. Conference of Mayors released a massive report that is a kind of wish list of some 11,391 infrastructure projects they hope to press ahead with.

"There's a general consensus that there will be more infrastructure spending," John Skowron, a federal and state consultant at Deloitte, said to Government Technology last month. "In the technology age, it may look different than the [Franklin Delano Roosevelt] infrastructure spending of solely bridges and highways. You could start to see spending within infrastructure from an IT perspective — next-generation networks, expanding broadband, looking at cyber-security."

Not only would federal money to local governments come with a "use it or lose it" clause under Obama's plans, but "the president-elect will also propose to direct some money to public and private partnerships for major projects like a national energy grid intended to harness alternative energy sources such as wind power," the New York Times reports advisers as having said.

Yet while McKinsey Quarterly recently estimated that private investment funds raised $105 billion for infrastructure projects worldwide from 2006 to mid-2007, the U.S. is roughly "20 years behind in developing, repairing and maintaining its transportation infrastructure," one engineer and bridge expert told Logistics Management in 2007. He noted that structural problems identified in the late 1970s have not been fixed by "any more than 3 percent to 5 percent."

That is why the infrastructure-rebuilding plan will likely remain a top initiative for the incoming U.S. president — and one that the new Congress is expected to tackle early upon its return today.


Earlier/Related

This Country is Falling Apart. Literally

U.S. Infrastructure in the Emergency Lane


Resources

Infrastructure Report Card
The American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005 (updated 2008)

National Action Agenda on Infrastructure for the Next President of the United States
The U.S. Conference of Mayors, Aug. 13-14, 2008

Housing Starts Plunge 18.9% to Record Low
by Rex Nutting
MarketWatch, Dec. 16, 2008

Economist: Obama Stimulus Not Enough
CBS News Face the Nation, Dec. 28, 2008

Remarks of President-elect Barack Obama - Radio Address on the Economy
Change.gov, Dec. 6, 2008

Groups Send Wish Lists for Economic Bill
by John Fritze
USA Today, Dec. 28, 2008

Governors Host Historic Meeting with Incoming Presidential Administration
National Governors Association, Dec. 2, 2008

Ready to Go: Jobs and Infrastructure Projects
The U.S. Conference of Mayors, Dec. 19, 2008

U.S. Mayor Say Local Infrastructure Projects Are Ready-to-Go
The U.S. Conference of Mayors, Dec. 8, 2008

Stimulus Competition Grows as Companies Vie for Funds
by Jonathan D. Salant and Kristin Jensen
MarketWatch, Dec. 16, 2008

Big Business Backs Infrastructure-Rebuilding Plan
by Tom Stundza
Purchasing.com, Dec. 10, 2008

Video: Infrastructure Spending Could Halt Falling Steel Prices
Purchasing.com, Dec. 14-20, 2008

Technology May Play Key Role in Obama Infrastructure Plan
by Matt Williams and Vander Veen
Government Technology, Dec. 29, 2008

Video: Pres.-Elect Barack Obama Press Conference on Veterans Affairs Nominee
C-SPAN, Dec. 7, 2008

As Outlook Dims, Obama Expands Recovery Plans
by Jackie Calmes
The New York Times, Dec. 20, 2008

How Investors Can Get More Out of Infrastructure
by Robert N. Palter, Jay Walder, and Stian Westlake
The McKinsey Quarterly, February 2008

Transportation Infrastructure: U.S. Senate Approves $1 Billion Amendment for Bridge Improvements
by Jeff Berman
Logistics Management, Sept. 11, 2007


Additional

Barack Obama/Joe Biden Economic Agenda

Wikipedia: National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank

Obama, Governors Share Plans for Boosting Public-Works Jobs
by Alexandra Marks
The Christian Science Monitor, Dec. 3, 2008

Obama's Single Most Important Reform
by Michael Lind
Salon.com, Dec. 9, 2008

The Obama Boomtowns
by Joshua Zumbrun
Forbes, Dec. 15, 2008

Obama: Transportation Can Get Economy Moving
by Joan Lowy
The Associated Press, Dec. 12, 2008


| Add to Y!MyWeb | Digg it | Add to Slashdot

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://news.thomasnet.com/mt41/mt-tb.cgi/1798




Advertisement


Comment

2 Comments

Terry Mock said:

Sustainable Land ­Development: Building a Bridge to a New Global Culture
http://www.sldtonline.com/content/view/580/1/

Amid all the bad news and demands being placed on the President-elect Obama transition team, Sustainable Land Development International (SLDI) offers a reason to hope for the future by formally submitting its offer of assistance to help boost the team's economic recovery plan and policy agenda – and save the country billions in the process - http://www.sldi.org/Pressreleases/pressrelease122308.html

SLDI, a developer-led and cooperatively-owned technology and information resource association, is now fully positioned to transform the industry that creates the very infrastructure of our civilization. Sustainable development starts with our global infrastructure. If it is unsustainable, ultimately nothing else can be. Featured products and services include green building technology, clean energy technology, ecosystem restoration, carbon sequestration technology, soil enhancement technology, water purification and retention technology, sustainable land development best practices systems and certification programs.

Your participation and comments are welcome.

Terry Mock
Executive Director
Sustainable Land Development International
www.SLDI.org
www.SLDTonline.com
www.SURmag.com
www.LDBreakthroughs.com
SLDI Newsletter - http://www.sldi.org/newService/SLDIJan2009.html

Promoting and enabling land development worldwide that balances the needs of people, planet & profit - for today and future generations.

January 6, 2009 6:37 PM


Spaceman Spiff said:

Well, DUUUHHHH!!!!!! To coin a phrase.

It seems that the public at large has never been able to get it through their minds that things eventually need to be repaired. We engineers design things to last for a general length of time called the The truth of the matter, of course, is that we DO design it properly at the start. But, without fail there is somebody telling us that it's well over the Budget set aside for it, and we have to find a less costly way to do it. So, we remove any of the bells and whistles on it at the start in order to get down closer to what the "public" wants to pay. Then, finally we have to start cutting into the "muscle" of the design to get it down even further and to the point where the politicians can be praised for being great economists and saving the public so much money.

I've a term I like to use, called "Reality-Based Engineering", in which the engineers design what we really need, and the administration agrees that it really IS better to build it right in the first place and they agree that it makes good sense to build it to last. And, it CAN be done. Otherwise, how could there be Roman aqueducts that are 2,000 years old and still supplying water to towns in Europe?

It's simply a matter of having the determination to build a quality product. And the tragedy of it is that in most cases, Service Life could easily be substantially increased by the investment of only a small percentage of the up-front cost. But, always it comes down to what it costs right now.

If the new President can get people to realize we have to build it right, and will force that sort of policy on the Federal Construction program, maybe we won't be doing this all again in 20 years or so.

January 7, 2009 12:24 AM




Leave a comment

 












Type the characters you see in the picture above.


 
 


Brought to you by Thomasnet.com        Browse ThomasNet Directory

Copyright © 2010 Thomas Publishing Company
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy