« Many Happy Returns for Customers | Main | The Last Light Friday of 2007 (Let's Make it Count) »
December 20, 2007
The Chicago Spire: An Engineering Feat at 2,000 Feet
The 2,000-foot, corkscrew-designed Chicago Spire may well be one of the most impressive engineering feats of 2007. Here's why.
Contractors broke ground on the Chicago Spire project in June. Situated on a 2.2-acre site where the Chicago River meets Lake Michigan, the Chicago Spire will build on the city’s significant architectural legacy.
Among its many engineering achievements, the Chicago Spire has a base-to-height ratio approaching one to 10, making it the most slender super-tall building in the world, according to Shelbourne Development Group, Inc.
When it is completed in 2011, it will not only be North America’s tallest building — surpassing Chicago’s own Sears Tower (1,450 ft. tall) and New York City's forthcoming Freedom Tower (planned to be 1,776 ft. tall) — it will also be the tallest residential building in the world, standing at 2,000 ft. (610 m). Further, the current design will surpass the height of the CN Tower in Toronto to become North America’s tallest freestanding structure and will also shatter the record for the longest continual elevator lift by 500 ft.
Some local people refer to the structure as Chicago’s “drill bit.” In various media coverage, the building has been compared not only to a drill bit, but also a blade of grass, a tall twisting tree and a lighthouse, according to ChicagoArchitecture.info. Moreover, as Architecture Magazine has pointed out, “many critics have noted [the dome-like roof] gives the entire tower the unfortunate form of a sex toy.”
Computer rendering of the Chicago Spire. This is the current design as of Sept. 26, 2007.
Credit: Santiago Calatrava - Shelbourne Development Group, Inc.
It will also include a relatively unique design feature: a twisting exterior designed to deflect wind. The seven-sided corkscrew design will reduce wind gusts at street level by directing most of the wind upward along the channels.
In rectangular buildings, a fluid wind flow puts pressure on the windward face of the building, while as air moves around it, a suction is applied to the leeward face. This often causes a sway in tall buildings which can be counteracted, at least partially, by stiffening the structure or by using a dynamic wind damper, according to the Mario Salvadori book Why Buildings Stand Up.
Although the curved design — which is similar to that of Sweden’s Turning Torso — will not completely negate wind forces, a tapering concrete core and about a dozen shear walls emanating from it are installed to counteract the wind forces.
Each of the building’s floors is anchored to a central column but offset. Each floor rotates on average 2.44 degrees from the one below, with a total rotation of 360 degrees as it reaches its 2,000 ft. height. The result is, in fact, very similar to a drill bit.
The building is designed to be made primarily out of concrete, and the spire rests on 34 caissons that are being drilled 110 ft. into the bedrock.
In addition, the Chicago Spire will incorporate world-class sustainable engineering practices to earn “gold” certification from the United States Green Building Council upon completion. Green touches include intelligent building and management systems, waste storage and recycling management, a cooling system that draws water from the Chicago River, cisterns for collecting rainwater for landscaping, monitored outdoor air delivery and ornithologically sensitive glass to prevent migratory-bird collisions.
According to a recent announcement from Popular Science, when the Chicago Spire is completed, residents near of its 150 floors will be able to see the curvature of the planet.
Imagine living with that window view!
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://news.thomasnet.com/mt41/mt-tb.cgi/1337
Comment
10 CommentsI think you should correct your information since the Burj Dubai will be 1000 meter
Kuwait will have 1100 meter amd the new jeddah tower which it will be called the miles long tower of 1600 metr
thank you
Raymond, thanks for weighing in.
As I understand it, the Burj Dubai will become the world's tallest *freestanding structure* and the building with most floors when completed.
Saudi Arabia's Mile Tower will be the highest building in the world when completed.
The proposed 1,001-meter Burj Mubarak al-Kabir of Madinat al-Hareer (Kuwait), if constructed, would be the world's tallest structure. At this point, the Kuwaiti tower exists only on paper.
The Chicago Spire, on the other hand, is under construction and will be the tallest building in North America and the tallest *residential building* in the world when completed (as noted in the post).
Whereas determining the world's tallest structure has been generally straightforward, determining the world's tallest building or the world's tallest tower is less clear. The disputes generally fall on what should be counted as a "building" or a "tower," and what is being measured. It may all just be rhetoric, but the competitiveness in racing to build these impressive super-tall buildings is intense and is only heating up.
Regards,
David
December 21, 2007 9:29 AMIF ITS SUCH A FEAT WHY NOT SHOW A PICTURE?
December 21, 2007 4:31 PMMichael, there is a picture. It's an artist's rendering of the building. I'm not sure if your Web settings don't allow you to see it or what, but it appears via both Firefox and Internet Explorer on my computer screen. Strange.
Anyone else not seeing the image in the post above?
Cheers,
David
December 21, 2007 4:46 PMImage appears here.
Mr Schmitz, why are you SCREAMING? Guessing you scrolled right over a picture that's been there since it was published. Keen eyes.
Keep up the good work guys. Happy new year.
December 28, 2007 2:01 PMIt's preeeety. I'll be sure and check it out (what's built of it that is) when I'm in Chi this spring.
January 2, 2008 3:54 PMmoa is good has nice form but still is a bit deco for that region
January 7, 2008 1:34 PMLooking at the spiral direction, it must have been designed by a leftie. :-)
January 17, 2008 8:55 AMI wonder if the designers considered the turbulence to airplanes flying overhead. I am reminded of the wake that small airplanes contend with if following too close behind a large airplane. I am curious how high up in altitude this building will affect the airflow.
January 21, 2008 12:04 PMIf Mayor Daley gets his way, there won't be ANY small airplanes permitted within several miles of it anyway.
Remember Meigs Field, and his illegal nighttime destruction of the runway, without so much as notifying owners of airplanes tied down there? Overlapping Class B & C airspace, transponder requirements, and other factors keep a huge number of small airplanes away in any case.
January 21, 2008 6:09 PM


