|
Advertisement
|
« Firing Up the Heatless Laser | Main | Burning Question »
July 10, 2007
Here Comes the Sun -- and Its Power
Demand for energy is expected to triple by 2050, and new investment and technology will be vital to easing the pressure on traditional sources. Harnessing the sun's power is one increasingly popular, if still flawed, option.
The worldwide demand for energy continues to grow while at the same time, environmental concerns have put pressure on traditional sources such as fossil fuels. As governments and individuals seek a balance between these two conflicting needs, alternative energy companies are finding themselves in the spotlight.
Many say one of the most popular energy sources for electricity will be solar power, whether for large-scale solar power stations or distributed energy applications at community levels. Solar energy uses no resources to speak of, emits no pollution and is immune to energy price hikes.
Examples of solar technologies being developed today are photovoltaic cells (pictured right), which convert sunlight directly into electricity and are made of semiconductors such as crystalline silicon or various thin-film materials; concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies, which use
reflective materials to concentrate the sun’s heat energy to ultimately drive an electricity-producing generator; and low-temperature solar collectors, which also absorb the sun’s heat energy.
Photovoltaics can provide tiny amounts of power for watches, large amounts for the electric grid and much in between. CSP technologies include dish/engine systems, parabolic troughs and central power towers. Low-temperature solar collectors absorb the sun’s heat energy, but the heat is used directly for hot water or space heating for residential, commercial and industrial facilities.
Proponents and detractors of solar power continue their debate every day. However, it’s the researchers, engineers, businesses, installers and buyers who really contribute to the argument over how powerful a force solar power could be in tomorrow’s economy.
Solar power use is expected to grow 40 percent a year through 2011, according to a Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Capital Markets report, which was released in May (via InvestmentNews.com). The report projected 2007 profits for the industry of $7.7 billion, rising to $11.5 billion by 2011.
Yet utility bosses, policymakers and many businesses tend to dismiss solar power and other alternatives as noble but expensive distractions, sustainable only through lavish subsidies. After all, solar power installation isn’t cheap, which is one of the main reasons it hasn’t cracked the mainstream. Many of today’s commercially available solar cells are made from silicon, which makes them expensive and less competitive compared with other sources of energy, such as coal.
Indeed, it takes a serious upfront investment. Photovoltaic panels hit the wallet hard, but a slew of tax breaks can pay for a notable percentage of the cost; for instance, you could get a 3-kilowatt system for about $10,000. It pays for several months of power per year, and the energy it feeds into the grid gets subtracted from your electricity bill.
However, as energy prices increase, consumers are getting this back increasingly quicker. Worldwide, the cost of converting sunlight to electricity is rapidly decreasing.
According to a Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Capital Markets report, the average cost for installed photovoltaic solar power will fall to $4.40 per kilowatt in 2011, from an estimated $7.37 this year. Solar power will be competitive with grid power at about $3.50 per kilowatt, a price it should attain between 2012 and 2014, depending on the region and government incentives.
“Within 10 years photovoltaic power will be competitive in price with traditional sources of electricity,” according to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). And Engineering News recently noted that the next generation of solar cells “will be light, flexible, attractive and, most importantly, cheap, because they will be made from organic (plastic) materials.”
For decades, researchers have worked to increase efficiency of solar panels. But because the progress has been painfully slow, scientists have taken different paths to converting sunlight into electricity.

For example, late last year DOE Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Alexander Karsner announced that with DOE funding, a concentrator solar cell produced by Boeing-Spectrolab had recently achieved a world-record conversion efficiency of 40.7 percent, “establishing a new milestone in sunlight-to-electricity performance.”
The DOE said this breakthrough “may lead to systems with an installation cost of only $3 per watt, producing electricity at a cost of 8-10 cents per kilowatt/hour, making solar electricity a more cost-competitive and integral part of our nation’s energy mix,” reported SolarBuzz.com.
Two major issues associated with solar is storage and transport of the energy. On this, Engineering News points to Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) for one example of a potential solution to the transport and storage of solar problem.
According to Engineering News:
The CSIRO is developing the technology to combine solar energy with natural gas […] The resulting product, SolarGas, embodies about 25% solar energy in the chemical bonds. This means solar energy can be stored and transported […] Solar-enhanced fossil fuels can be exported, and represent a transitional route to much larger contributions of solar energy to the energy mix.
If the Solar Energy Research and Advancement Act of 2007, H.R. 2774 bill, introduced last month, passes through Congress, it would instruct the Secretary to establish an R&D program on “thermal energy storage technologies for concentrating solar power.” One section authorizes appropriations of $5 million in fiscal year 2008, $7 million in fiscal year 2009, $9 million in fiscal year 2010, $10.5 million in fiscal year 2011, and $12 million in fiscal year 2012. The bill also would authorize $10 million for a Solar Energy Curriculum Development and Certification grant program in each fiscal year from FY08 through FY12.
(Governments in many developed nations are pushing subsidies to stimulate demand, as well as innovation, in this field. For instance, householders, schools and community organizations planning to take advantage of the Australian government’s new $150 million solar power rebate can apply immediately for the increased rebate.)
For now, gutsy companies with money to spend across globe have installed solar panels. Google has launched the largest solar panel installation to date on a corporate campus in the U.S. It has installed more than 90 percent of the 9,212 solar panels that comprise the 1,600-kilowatt project, which is expected to produce 30 percent of Google’s peak electricity demand in its solar-powered buildings at the Mountain View, Calif., headquarters.
Google expects to save “close to $15 million over the 30-year lifespan of its system,” according to RenewableEnergyAccess.com. Payback period: 7.5 years.
Consumers, too, are moving along with installing solar panels and other green technologies.

Photovoltaic solar panels on the roof of a house near Boston, Mass.
Credit: Wikipedia
According to The Associated Press (via CommercialAppeal.com), “Off-the-grid living is edging into the American mainstream. It isn’t there yet, but about 180,000 homes, mostly in the West, operate on it.” Much of the growth is in California, but off-the-grid living is also growing in Texas, New Jersey and Wisconsin.
Most of the homeowners’ solar panels “easily handle their computers, lights, large-screen televisions, microwave ovens, refrigerator-freezers and more.”
“It pretty much tracks where the best rebates are” for the cost of the equipment, Connie Said of Home Power told AP.
The long-term outlook for the solar-power sector appears positive, though stocks of companies in the sector are expected to “remain volatile in the near term,” according to the RBC Capital Markets report. Consolidation is likely among installers of independent solar-power systems, smaller cell and module makers, and producers of silicon, the report said.
Resources
Here comes the sun: investors moving into rapidly expanding solar power industry
RBC Capital Market, May 9, 2007
Solar: Long-Term Gains Outweigh Upfront Costs
by John Darling
The Mail Tribune, July 5, 2007
New Comprehensive Overview of World Industrial Energy Efficiency and CO2 Intensity
International Energy Agency, June 25, 2007
Sun Will Shine on Solar-Energy Investing, Report Says
by Liz Skinner
InvestmentNews.com, June 18, 2007
Solar Energy Research and Advancement Act of 2007
U.S. House of Representatives Science & Technology Committee, June 19, 2007
Washington, DC, USA: Department of Energy Announces 40% Efficient Concentrator Solar Cell
SolarBuzz.com, Dec. 6, 2006
Successful Green Energy Conference in Pasadena Highlighted Significant New Technologies
GreenTech 2007 (via Business Wire), June 15, 2007
Google Powers Up 1.6 MW Solar System & Hybrid Initiative
by Meghan Murphy
RenewableEnergyAccess.com, June 20, 2007
An Increasing Number of Homeowners Are Going ‘Off Grid’
by Joseph B. Frazier
The Associated Press (via CommercialAppeal.com), June 20, 2007
Solar Energy – How the Aussies Go About It
by Karel Smrcka
Engineering News, July 6, 2007
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://news.thomasnet.com/mt41/mt-tb.cgi/1123
|
|
Comment
7 CommentsSince you never get something for nothing - what is the real environmental cost of solar? What would be the impact of converting every surface in the world to a solar cell? Would it start an ice age?
July 10, 2007 3:23 PMthe solar article would be more beneficial to us if you cited products that are available, contacts of companies that are selling or manufacturing (contacts), etc... your newsletter has been helpful in the past because it gave hard data about current state of the art products, contacts, etc...
thanks,
-----
Ed. Note:
"Home Power" magazine may be the best source out there for solar information (free for download, plus all back issues are on CD-ROM):
http://www.homepower.com/
The Solar Guide also provides quite a bit of info. on all things solar (applications, events, FAQs, timely news, etc.):
http://www.thesolarguide.com/
Alternative-Energy-News.com also offers up-to-date news and developments surrounding solar:
http://tinyurl.com/246g7n
As for products and contacts specifically...
Solar Reviews provides just that -- reviews for various solar products:
http://www.solar-review.com/reviews/
You can also search ThomasNet.com (top left corner of this page) for sellers and manufacturers of solar products and services, or browse the solar categories.
If none of these provide you with what you're looking for, you can also ask other industrial professionals in the ThomasNet Forums (top of this page, straight up) for specific product recommendations.
Hope these resources help, Mike.
Regards,
IMT editor
July 10, 2007 3:57 PMThe subject on solar energy is very important to us and the article is quite helpful. It is well prepared and saved me a lot of time to do the information search myself.
July 11, 2007 12:10 AMGood article I've been looking at this with great interest and would like to suggest its use in the business I'm in.
Communications since we have half the infrastructure in place to make this work.
And do we believe in the Easter Bunny too! To
insinuate that solar panels use little raw materials and have minimal environmental impact is just plain wrong. Vast amounts of energy are used as are used in any manufacturing endevour. How does the raw material get there, how is it secured, what runs the refining process, what runs the manufacturing process? As in any hi-tech assembly vast energy is used in just getting ready...and in virtually all cases, it is the fossil fuel energy providers that are used, be they typical grid producers of electricity or big oil that provides gas/diesel for the construction process. What energy source puts the panels in place? What energy source intergrates them into a service link to the grid?
Google should certainly be congratulated for the
steps they have taken, but to use them as an example of what can be done is a bit shady to put it mildly. The two key comments would be, they estimate 30% of their need filled---should read that still 70% will rely on traditional power sources...and...what percent of their gross income was used to fund the effort and how does that number compare to the investment by a typical home owner to secure only 30% of his power needs....plus he must secure and maintain the same system his neighbor has, with no solar, to be assured he can support the 70% solar will not provide. The real truth of the energy situation in the US will never be solved until we stop putting vast amounts of energy and yes, articles by well meaning people, in fantasy solutions...those include solar, wind, tidal and god knows what else and realize that it is fossil fuel or nuclear as the only long range, 100% reliable solutions for every person. Governments in Europe and Asia have...why are we so backward?
that's great and i'm very much interested about this subject, solar energy and the solar panels in the house due to it being a clean power. i hope to join in this work.
October 10, 2007 6:43 PMHi,
In school and writing exposition for solar power and am very fascinated on all the good things on solar power,
Thanks Harry Watts
November 20, 2007 11:37 PM




