Quantcast
 
Search for: Search what?
  

 Newsletters
Industry Market Trends
Get our free bi-weekly Industry Market Trends newsletter delivered by e-mail.
Subscribe    View Sample

Product News Alerts
Get customized, daily news on the products and services you want to know about.
Subscribe   View Sample
 Recent Entries
 Archives by Year
 Recommended Reading
book9.25b.JPG

Hardcover, 576pp
Harvard Business Press, October 2008 (Updated and Expanded)
ISBN-13: 978-1422126967
Read more


 Blogroll
Advertisement

« Getting Serious about Energy Efficiency | Main | Process Industries Transforming Old Supply Chain Strategies »


July 24, 2007

Is Your Lean LAME?

By David R. Butcher

Lean, or the elimination of muda ("waste"), is an ongoing process; half-hearted attempts to institute it will always fail. Here are some signs that your lean effort may be L.A.M.E.: "Lean As Misguidedly Executed."

Lean, the set of management practices based on the Toyota Production System (TPS), is meant to eliminate muda (a.k.a. waste, a.k.a. non-value-added activity) in all processes to improve efficiency, reduce cycle times and increase bottom-line profitability. Although lean initiatives can help manufacturers achieve on-time delivery and operational excellence, as well as shorter order cycles, reduce costs and increase revenue, it is neither a solution nor a quick fix — it is an ongoing process of continuous improvement, a tenet that cannot be emphasized enough.

Although an increasing number of manufacturers are implementing lean initiatives to create competitive advantage, more than 90 percent of lean transformations fail, according to Bill Waddell, lean manufacturing consultant and the author of Rebirth of American Industry, at the Evolving Excellence blog.

Half-hearted attempts to institute "a quick fix" lean system almost always fail. Even serious attempts can fail.

This "failure" is typically due to companies taking a shortsighted view of lean, engaging in sporadic lean projects with no long-term lean strategy to follow. Others have difficulty gaining executive sponsorship or commitment, leading to compromised lean results. Managing cultural change and engaging employee participation are big challenges.

Often the problem is not with the concept of lean; rather, it is with the implementation.

Lean Versus LAME
Mark Graban at the Lean Blog recently coined the phrase L.A.M.E. as "Lean As Misguidedly Executed," and Kevin Meyer at the Evolving Excellence blog built upon the idea.

The following are some signs that your lean effort may be LAME:

1) Not Communicating Why You're Going Lean
One of the two primary pillars of lean practices is "respect for people," as noted in Lean Blog's definition. Yet the first assumption people will make is that lean means "Less Employees Are Needed," according to Jon Miller at Gemba Panta Rei: "No matter how many times you explain the big picture, customer-focused, long-term thinking reason for going Lean, people will tune back into radio station WIFM — What's in it for Me?"

Because it isn't easy getting companies to buy into the idea of respecting people, particularly when cost cutting and quarterly earnings are often the most powerful drivers in the business, lean requires effective — even passionate — leadership.

Leadership's commitment will be tested early and often, and it will be watched closely, "so look for opportunities to make believers out of those on the fence," writes Healthcare Performance Partners, LLC President and CEO Charles Hagood in The 12-1/2 Truths of a Lean Transformation.

As Evolving Excellence puts it: "How many times have we had to prove that 90 percent of a process is waste, while people in the organization are convinced that it is already as efficient as it can be? The leader... the teacher... must create that vision of the future, which to most will seem unattainable."

"An effective change vision must include not just new strategies and structures but also new, aligned behaviors on the part of senior executives. Leading by example means just that," Harvard Business School professor John P. Kotter wrote in Leader to Leader Journal back in 1998.

Yet too many managers simply do not understand that lean manufacturing is all about management, Evolving Excellence says:

They think manufacturing excellence can be bought through consultants or acquisitions; or simply dictated by top management fiat. Factories are as lean or as fat, as good or as bad, and as profitable or not as management drives them to be. The idea that a factory can be changed from fat to lean while management remains the same is just plain silly.

"Ultimately, nothing will kill buy-in and commitment from the frontline troops faster than leadership and management not following through on its commitments to the transformation," says Hagood.

Keep communicating the reason lean is essential until employees understand and believe it, Miller urges.

2) An "Adequate" Level of Lean Education
"Although being lean begins with culture and leadership," according to Meyer at Evolving Excellence, "it cannot end with that."

Miller writes at Gemba Panta Rei:

Whether it be a number of hours, certification through attending a number of seminars or courses, reading books or being on a number of Kaizen events, as soon as you set the "enough" level of Lean education and ask them to get back to work, you have a misguided Lean execution. Toyota says "monozukuri wa hitozukuri," or "making things is making people." Real Lean is the Thinking People System, and this requires a long-term commitment to superior manufacturing (or service) through people development.

Many organizations do few fly-by kaizen, value stream, rapid improvement or 5-S events in selected areas and consider the job done. "All that will do is get the organization initially excited only to be let down from lack of sustainability," Hagood points out. "Lean has to become more than a program or a few events. It must become a way of life that permeates all levels."

As Toyota President Katsuaki Watanabe recently said of the Toyota Way: "I don't think I have a complete understanding even today, and I have worked for the company for 43 years."

An excerpt from Henry Ford's My Life and Work:

None of our men are "experts." The moment one gets into the "expert" state of mind, a great number of things become impossible.

Remember the kaizen notion of continuous improvement. Which leads us to...

3) Having a Lean Completion Date
The process of improving never ends.

"Once you truly understand lean, you'll want to put a zero after whatever number you have as the completion date [of your lean implementation plan], or scratch the number off all together," according to Miller.

And Hagood notes:

A lean transformation has no end date. The process is ongoing and is never a closed-out action item. There is no such thing as the perfect company or process, therefore the closest to perfect you can become is to recognize that it is a continuous process of improvement.

"While it is important to celebrate results along the way, kidding yourself or others about the difficulty and duration of organizational transformation can be catastrophic," Kotter wrote in Leader to Leader. "Celebrating incremental improvements is a great way to mark progress and sustain commitment — but don't forget how much work is still to come," Kotter emphasized.

The recent publicity about Toyota becoming No. 1 (albeit briefly) is expected to create another burst of energy to lean initiatives, even though a survey by management consulting firm Bain shows that just 19 percent of companies that have tried it are happy with the results, Mark Gottfredson, Bain's head of performance improvement, recently said in a notable article from the American Society for Quality.

So, according to true lean believers (Remember continuous improvement!), if this news means that lean is going to become the new "flavor of the month" in business operations, then that 19 percent rate will either remain constant or even drop.


Resources

Pogo Was Talkin' about Me
Evolving Excellence.com, Jan. 3, 2006

Lean or LAME?
Lean Blog, March 21, 2007

A Telling Lean Typo?
Evolving Excellence, March 22, 2007

What Is Lean? A Lean Definition
Lean Blog, May 13, 2005

Here Are 4.5 Signs that Your Lean May Be L.A.M.E.
by Jon Miller
Gemba Panta Rei, May 13, 2007

The Teaching Leader
by Kevin Meyer
Evolving Excellence, March 25, 2007

Winning at Change
by John P. Kotter
Leader to Leader, Fall 1998

Stop the Flow of Blood
by Bill Waddell
Evolving Excellence, Nov. 2, 2005

Looking Lean vs. Being Lean - It Begins With Leadership and Culture
by Kevin Meyer
Evolving Excellence, Jan. 9, 2006

My Life and Work
by Henry Ford and Samuel Crowther
Kessinger Publishing, January 2003

Toyota's vault to No. 1 puts focus (good and bad) on lean
by The American Society for Quality
Reliable Plant Magazine, May 2007

GM Narrows Sales Gap With Toyota on Non-U.S. Demand (Update4)
by Kae Inoue and Greg Bensinger
Bloomberg News, July 20, 2007

Additional

Going Lean Alone
by Robert L. Clippard (Clippard Instrument Lab Inc.)
Machine Design, July 12, 2007

Making The Shift To A Lean Enterprise
by Dave Wolgast and Guy Morgan
IndustryWeek, April 04, 2007

Transforming Your Business To Lean: Lessons Learned
by Dave Gleditsch
IndustryWeek, Jan. 18, 2007

More Lean Lessons
by Dave Gleditsch
IndustryWeek, Jan. 31, 2007

10 Common Misconceptions About Lean Manufacturing
by Jon Miller
Gemba Panta Rei, June 24, 2007



| Add to Y!MyWeb | Digg it | Add to Slashdot

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://news.thomasnet.com/mt41/mt-tb.cgi/1139




Advertisement


Comment

4 Comments

Having worked in American industry from the heyday of the Military Industrial complex to the modern jargon intense companies of today; I have seen it all. There has been one clichéd program after another for my 45 years as an engineer. None of the companies believed in any of it, and less believe in it now than ever before. There have been innumerable euphuistic titles for repackaged stuff, all based on TWI from 70 years ago. There is no reason, and no emergency that will force any of these so-called improvements on any company because the powers-that-be are only interested in a very narrow definition of a successful company; one that relates to quarterly goals and their bonuses. There is no understanding of quality or improvement.

If anything sticks from these programs, it's usually a bureaucracy, with all of its effects and self perpetuation. I have spent the last 20 years in the medical device business, and I have watched one company after another, layer one program on top of another in a frantic search for the perfect system, but never giving up the last system or mindset. It's like the latest incarnation of matrix management (Thankfully I've forgotten what it is now called); it still doesn't work. You can call it anything you want and use any language you prefer...preferably not English, and require the learning of a whole new senseless vocabulary. This is so you can use the artifacts of the system in your next resume.

The "what's-in-it-for-me" that's mentioned is because people on the front lines know exactly what is in it for them…nothing; except more work to do, in order to appease the latest hideous beast, until it goes away and the next magic brute comes down the pike.

Thank the Cosmic Muffin; I'm going to retire soon.

July 24, 2007 10:44 PM


David said:

It amazes me how as years go by the vocabulary changes but the approach doesn't. Evidently, neither do the results.

At SEMATECH, we reduced cycle time of the Project Approval to signed Contract from 213 days to 47 days. That was in 1993. Wonder what it is now.

July 25, 2007 5:27 PM


Anthony Hedayat said:

I think Tim needs to write a book! It should be a bestseller because it is honest while all the other yahoo's out their stumbling over themeselves to sell a bunch of BS need someone to tell the truth. Only from a breath of fresh air could one even begin to think clearly about what tommorrow may bring. I too get so sick and tired of all the empty rhetoric ra ra crap while the system is melting down and the 'Smithers' of the world continue to run show.

August 22, 2007 8:25 PM


Bill said:

Lean Manufacturing is only as good as the folks leading and implementing it.

Unfortunately, it has been tried as a "flavor of the month" program, but fortunately, many many good companies are using Lean practices to compete in a world market...and winning.

That's my .02 worth anyway.

And I am sincerely sorry for any who have been burned by L.A.M.E. and have not yet experienced "Lean".

All the Best,

Bill

September 25, 2007 8:06 PM




Leave a comment

 












Type the characters you see in the picture above.


 
 


Brought to you by Thomasnet.com        Browse ThomasNet Directory

Copyright © 2009 Thomas Publishing Company
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy