![]() |
|
« Burning Question | Main | Congratulations, Robot Mother! It's a Healthy Robot Baby! »
April 25, 2006
Enthusing Employees without Pom-Poms
Management wants motivated and enthused workers. But how do companies maintain an excited workforce? Most companies have it all wrong, according to Harvard Business School. Companies don't have to motivate their employees: "They have to stop demotivating them."
Think about when you first began working at any one of your past jobs, or even your current one. It was a new experience with so much opportunity. You likely were quite enthusiastic when you first started, no? However, survey research of about 1.2 million employees (conducted by Sirota Survey Intelligence) finds that in about 85 percent of companies, employees' morale sharply declines at the point of six months employed, after which time morale continues to deteriorate for years.
Sounds about right: that downward spiral from initial enthusiasm to a mentality of giving just enough effort to get the job done nothing more.
A recent article from Harvard Business School says it is the responsibility of management to motivate and enthuse, particularly through company-employed policies and procedures in workforce management, as well as the relationships that individual managers establish with their direct reports.
If companies are to maintain employees' initial enthusiasm, says the renowned business school, management should understand and address three key goals the majority of employees seek from their work:
1) Equity Respect and fair treatment in terms of pay, benefits and job security
2) Achievement Pride in job, accomplishments and employer
3) Camaraderie Productive relationships with colleagues
HBS makes important note that, in order to maintain an excited workforce, "management must meet all three goals." If even one of the above factors is missing within a company, employees are full-on three times (3x!) less enthusiastic than workers at companies where all elements are present. One goal is not substitutable for another: "Improved recognition cannot replace better pay, money cannot substitute for taking pride in a job well done, and pride alone will not pay the mortgage."
First, perhaps foremost, managers should provide employees with a sense of security. Employees should not fear their jobs are in jeopardy if their performance is imperfect. Layoffs are an extreme last resort, not simply another option for "dealing with hard times." This should be made known within the organization and the department.
After security, the following Harvard Business School-proffered practices can play a key role in keeping employees both motivated and enthused. (Note: Practices are categorized based on relation to each of the three goals.)
Achievement
Inspiring purpose
Employees should have "a clear, credible and inspiring organizational purpose." A mission statement can be a powerful tool. Equally important, however, is the manager's ability to explain and communicate to subordinates the reason behind the mission.
Recognition
Employee contributions, both large and small, should be recognized. Says Harvard Business School: "The motto of many managers seems to be, 'Why would I need to thank someone for doing something he's paid to do?'" Yet employees feel distressed when treated like judges, sports umpires or referees (and editors?) when their efforts are acknowledged only when criticized for their mistakes.
HBS points out that "receiving recognition for achievements is one of the most fundamental human needs." So reinforce employees' accomplishments via positive recognition, thus helping ensure there will be more of them.
Expediter for employees
Managers should redefine their primary role as serving as their employees' expediter. Managers, find out what is most important to your employees for getting their jobs done by asking them. And if you are unable to address a particular need or request immediately, be open about it and keep them updated on any progress toward resolution of the issue.
Coaching for improvement
Comments concerning desired improvements should be specific, factual, unemotional and directed at performance. Managers should keep feedback relevant to the employee's role and should listen to employees' views of problems. DO NOT offer feedback about something you know nothing about; have someone who knows the situation look at it.
Remember the reason you're giving feedback: performance improvement, not proving your superiority.
Equity
Full communication
Full and open communication not only helps employees do their jobs but also is a powerful sign of respect. Managers should place very few restrictions on information flow, holding back nothing of interest to employees except those very few items that are absolutely confidential.
Most managers should discipline themselves to communicate regularly, whether by oft-scheduled meetings or stopping by for a chat. "And tell it like it is," says the business school. "Many employees are quite skeptical about management's motives and can quickly see through 'spin.'"
Facing poor performance
Identify and deal decisively with the small percentage of employees who simply don't want to work. While most people want to work and achieve, some employees will do just about anything to avoid it. The disciplinary approach is about the only way the unmotivated can be managed.
Camaraderie
Promoting teamwork
The quality of a group's efforts in areas such as problem solving usually is superior to that of an individual working on his or her own. Whenever possible, managers should organize employees into self-managed teams after carefully assessing who works best with whom. Such teams require less management and normally result in a healthy reduction in management layers and costs. The new team should be clear about its role, how it will operate and the manager's expectations.
Related To All Three Factors
Listening and involving
Employees are a rich source of information about how to do a job and how to do it better. They almost always should be kept involved. Participative managers continually are open to, and make known their interest in, employees' ideas.
If managers can keep employees enthusiastic about their jobs, perhaps employees will show more enthused effort in their current positions and less in looking for a new one.
Source
Why Your Employees Are Losing Motivation
by David Sirota, Louis A. Mischkind and Michael Irwin Meltzer
Harvard Business School, Apr 10, 2006
Reprinted from "Stop Demotivating Your Employees!"
Harvard Management Update, Vol. 11, No. 1, January 2006
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://news.thomasnet.com/mt41/mt-tb.cgi/515
|
Advertisement
|
Comment
30 CommentsI think this article was great and to the point. In fact, I am making copies and sending them to our CEO, COO, CFO and our human resources director. Thank you.
April 25, 2006 1:23 PMHey, thanks, Bill!
We hope you continue to have such appreciation -- dare we say "enthusiasm" -- over our editorial and the sources from which we aggregate such topics.
(And hopefully your CEO, COO, CFO and HR director will find the content's message just as noteworthy...)
Cheers.
-DRB, editor
April 25, 2006 2:14 PMThis is a well-written article with valuable points to focus on. I will be sending it to several of my clients.
April 25, 2006 2:28 PMExcellent article!
I like your writing style: clear and to the point. Your references and examples are well presented. Thank you.
April 25, 2006 2:32 PMThis is one of the best things I have read on the damage done by managers that are not trained to be that motivator of people. I am sending this to our HRO Director, as we have discussed and cussed this malady many times. I'm contemplating who else is in need of this info. Thanks.
April 25, 2006 3:10 PMFantastic article that reminds managers at every level the importance of keeping employees focused on the things that make them excited to preform. Thanks!
April 25, 2006 4:26 PMGreat Article! I have viewed these de-motivating methods so many times in my previous jobs (two major corporations) that it motivated me to start my own company.
Now I can practice as "motivationally" needed and I will definetly forward this to my V.P. of Sales.
Thank you so much for the reinforcement.
April 25, 2006 5:37 PMA terrific article! I liked both your style and the contents -- some "simple" truths, presented in a clear and concise manner.
I am refering your article to my colleagues, recommending that we practice what you have suggested.
Thank you!
April 27, 2006 9:40 PMIt isn't rocket science. I have been in both working environments. Currently I am fortunate to work for an employee-owned company and all 3 of the highlighted items are ingrained in our corporate culture. What a difference.
Ronald Hicks, CRIS
Bollinger Insurance
Well-written article! The need of the day, particularly in Indian organizations where there are more in population but still want of people in industry.
May 16, 2006 10:43 PMGreat article. Workplace truths simplified. I am marking the copy to friends of mine, so that a wider audience may be benefited. Keep up the good work.
May 17, 2006 6:50 AMWonderful article with a lot of facts. The upper management must learn to share their large piece of pie with those who do not get to share the pie. Outsourcing is not the solution to the problems in U.S. Think about it for a while.
Regards,
Tom
A great reminder of a mutually beneficial practice for employers & employees. This article will make great fodder for discussion at the next manager's meeting.
Cheers,
John
You want to know what de-motivates employees? Here's a couple things: Managers who can't manage. The embodiment of the Peter Principle: promoted beyond their capacity; promoted for longevity. The "old boy network", promoted by cronyism.
All of the above are generally unsuited by temperment and training (lack of it).
Add in the idea of "occasionally" by-passing the process of defining the job, advertising for it, interviewing interested parties, and then choosing the best.
These are the real de-motivaters, in spite of what the HBS may think.
SLC
May 22, 2006 3:48 PMThe greatest demotivator in my opinion is managers thinking their job is to make all the decisions without the input of the employees.
The job of management is to create an environment that puts the best interest of others first, encourages employee input & involvement and is willing to transfer ownership and accountability to those closest to the customer.
Management needs to understand that their job is to remove barriers so employees can do their job.
May 24, 2006 5:17 PM


