![]() |
|
« The Lingering Effects of Auto Industry Restructure | Main | RFID Growing Pains »
April 18, 2006
Of Hurricanes' Aftermath, N'Orleans' Levees, Engineers' Efforts
The 2006 hurricane season offically begins in about a month and a half. And the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, after many hindrances, hopes to repair and strengthen the New Orleans-area levee and floodwall system damaged by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita...by June 1. How close is the Corps to reaching its self-set goal?
As the next month and a half dissipates toward the official commencement of the 2006 hurricane season, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is "well on its way to accomplishing" the initial goal set for repairing and strengthening those segments of the hurricane protection system that were damaged by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita last year, according to the organization.
"The effort to effectively restore the hurricane protection system that was so badly damaged by hurricanes Katrina and Rita last year is one of the largest and most ambitious civil works projects ever undertaken in the United States," said Maj. Gen. Don Riley, USACE director of Civil Works, in a recent Army Corps of Engineers announcement.
The current standing of restoration to the many miles of damaged levees is as follows:
Orleans East Bank, 27 percent;
Inner-harbor Navigation Channel, 64 percent;
New Orleans East, 72 percent;
St. Bernard, 74 percent; and
Plaquemines, 74 percent.
The goal for completion of repairs to the damaged levees is June 1, 2006.
The effort to inspect the entire levee and floodwall system has been ongoing since September 2005. As such, the Corps continues to conduct both surface and subsurface inspections of the remaining 181 miles of the New Orleans-area levee system that was not visibly damaged by last year's hurricanes.
On low ground, surrounded by water on all sides, New Orleans depends on a manmade system to protect it from potential disasters such as floods, hurricanes and storms. Pump stations, some a century old, move water from city streets into a series of canals that ultimately lead to Lake Pontchartrain. Three major outfall canals drain water from the center of the city north to the lake. More than 14 miles of levees and floodwalls bordering these canals form part of the region's Hurricane Protection System; the 17th Street Canal, the Orleans Avenue Canal and the London Avenue Canal proved vulnerable to Katrina's massive storm surge.
So adding a structure at the mouth of each canal is considered key to better protection. These new structures can keep storm surge out and can permit existing pump stations to continue operation.
The fabrication and installation of temporary closure gates at the mouths of the three aforementioned outfall drainage canals continues to progress. Once installed, these massive structures should isolate the outfall canals and their levee walls from potential Lake Pontchartrain storm surge during the upcoming hurricane season. The gates will be closed only when the canals are potentially threatened by Lake Pontchartrain surge.
The first portions of the 17th Street Canal closure gate were placed on barges in late March to begin their movement to the installation site.
Approximately 38 miles of the system are topped by I-walls similar to those that were breached along the three outfall canals during Katrina. The several approaches that the Corps is taking to quickly minimize any possible I-wall deficiencies include the following: thoroughly inspect those that were not damaged; replace damaged I-walls with T-walls (2.4 miles); isolate the I-walls along the interior drainage canals from any storm surge (8.6 miles); and replace I-wall with levee enlargement in Plaquemines Parish (6 miles).
The Corps has also doubled the standard amount of quality-control and quality-assurance inspections to "ensure the soil and other materials, as well as their placement, meet the highest standards." All inspections particularly along the I-wall portions are enhanced by detailed information and analysis provided to the Corps by the Interagency Performance Evaluation Task Force (IPET). The IPET, which is comprised of more than 150 engineers, scientists and other experts from government, academia and industry, will take a thorough look at the performance of the hurricane protection system during Hurricane Katrina.
Despite the Corps' "good news" regarding progress, though, there continue to be hindrances.
Last week, the Bush administration proposed spending an additional $2.5 billion for New Orleans levee construction and simultaneously issued long-awaited building guidelines for the flood-prone region that would require rebuilding many heavily damaged homes at least three feet above the ground. Wednesday's announcement, according to the Washington Post (via Concord Monitor) "is an attempt to lay to rest some of the fears that have stalled the recovery." When combined with previous efforts, the $2.5 billion proposal is intended to protect 98 percent of the population from a 1-in-100-year flood by adding stronger walls and making the levees taller, in some cases seven feet.
However, the plans do not include the south Plaquemines peninsula through which the Mississippi River flows into the Gulf. In fact, the USACE estimated it would cost another $1.6 billion to protect just 2 percent of the at-risk population, or about 14,000 people in small towns like Buras, Triumph and Venice. Last week's staggering new cost estimates for building levees in little towns in lower Plaquemines Parish is roughly more than $100,000 for every person living in such towns before the flood, federal rebuilding coordinators reported.
The Bush administration has already requested or received approval from Congress for $3.5 billion in levee improvements, and the plans do not require state contributions. Administration officials said they were still weighing whether to spend an additional $1.6 billion for levee improvements there.
The dismal cost-benefit analysis has thrown into doubt not only the levee project but also the continued existence of the rural communities that are depending on it in the water-rimmed strip about 60 miles southeast of New Orleans. Lacking proper protection would make it extremely difficult to rebuild in the area new buildings might be required to be elevated as high as 35 feet to meet flood insurance requirements, officials have said and many believe it could lead to its virtual abandonment.
Notes The Washington Post (via Detroit News):
With an estimated 20 square miles of coastal Louisiana disappearing every year, scientists have long raised the possibility that there may have to be a "managed retreat" from portions of the coast, with some unfortunate communities pulling up stakes as the waters encircle their settlements. Not fixing the levees in lower Plaquemines Parish, now a distinct possibility, would amount to the same thing, residents said.
"It would be the first time that this country has simply abandoned an entire community at least I can't think of another example like it," said Benny Rousselle, president of the parish.
The new timetable for the reconstruction effort, according to the Corps, is as follows:
June 1, 2006 Completion of repairs to levees damaged by Katrina
September 2007 Completion of restoration of undamaged and subsided areas; completion of previously unconstructed portions of authorized projects
December 2007 Completion of final technical report that analyzes higher levels of protection (Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Report)
2010 Certify the levees' flood protection as meeting NFIP's 100-year protection level, as well as additional improvements such as:
o Permanent Closure and Pumping Stations at the Outfall Canals
o Navigable Floodgates to Protect the Industrial Canal
o Storm Proofing of Existing Pump Stations
o Selective Armoring of Levees
o Incorporating a Portion of Non-Federal Levee in Plaquemines Parish
o Ecosystem Restoration.
"There is a great deal of work yet to be completed and inspected to meet the [June 1, 2006] goal," said USACE's Riley, "and much more to be done beyond that date to effectively meet long-term hurricane protection goals."
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://news.thomasnet.com/mt41/mt-tb.cgi/510
|
Advertisement
|
Comment
12 CommentsAnd they complain that this administration has abandoned New Orleans. How much money do they want from us? $3,500,000,000 Is a lot of money just to allow people to build in the flood zones in just one city. There was no construction in the flood zones while the French owned this town.
April 18, 2006 12:45 PMStupid is as stupid does. Does it take a rocket scientist to know not to build homes on land that is below or at sea level? Maybe they should be building submarines instead of houses. There are plenty of empty lands around the country for citizens to live. If the masses of poor folks want to live in hazardous areas, they should not expect help when all hell breaks loose. How much more money can we waste on extremely hard-to-protect lands?
April 18, 2006 6:30 PMAs a New Orleanian whose life has been altered permanantly by the failure of the improperly designed outfall canal flood walls and the destruction of Louisiana's wetland protection, and in consideration of the fact that Louisiana has never received it's fair share of oil and gas revenues: the country cannot spend too much money to save south Lousiana.
April 19, 2006 4:23 PMIt would be cheaper to buy those people out and have them move to a safer spot of their own choosing. All communities at risk, and coastline at risk should be preserved or naturally enhanced as our first line of defense from storms. The Miss. River should be allowed to re-silt many of those adjacent areas to re-build the shoreline.
April 19, 2006 4:48 PMAfter spending the last 6 months inspecting damages on the Gulf Coast and south Florida, here's my 2-cents worth:
No levee or storm barrier (short of a hyper-expensive Great Wall, like the Dutch 10,000-year storm design) will survive the next 20+ ft. storm surge. Folks living and re-building on the Gulf Coast are asking for disaster, and their worst nightmares will be coming true soon.
Assuming the climate modelers are not totally full of beans, all levees and walls will need to be 3 or 4 or 5 feet taller within the next 50 to 100 years, thanks to melting of glacial ice. Do we really want to end up with dozens of N'Awlins situations along ALL our coasts?? (Millions of people in below-sea-level bowls, dreading the next Katrina.) Cities and states will have to take the lead in recognizing and dealing with this rapidly oncoming mess. (Or- are we willing to let FEMA- or Congress- do all our thinking for us???)
April 19, 2006 6:14 PMHow much money? If the proper work was done the first time, money would not be the issue. Uncle Bush knew this already, along with his crew. How much money? How much do we give away everyday to help a country that is definitely killing us. We can not take care of our own, but we can take care of the rest of the world. I think we should step back and evaluate some true priorities. Remember, natural disaster can occur anywhere. Wake up, everybody
April 20, 2006 2:06 AM


