![]() |
|
« Light Thursday: Best of the Best of the Best | Main | Aforetime New Year's Wishes! »
December 30, 2005
Light Thursday: Best of the Best of the Best, Part Deux
Best of the Best of the Best of 2005 continued from Intel to Oprah, movies to wine, and sustainable corporations to things said when they thought the mics were off.
Perhaps like you, I could basically care less about Oprah, or even her favorite or most beloved things. But I'm trying to be open-minded here. Maybe you're an Oprah fan, or know of one to whom you can pass this link along.
Matter of fact, most of Oprah's Favorite Things are pretty much meaningless, pretentious, arrogant, or even offensive to me. A diamond watch? A Burberry coat and purse? What is this, Forbes? She really knows how to connect with the masses, eh? I was going to take a shot at the omission of her bird-squishing GulfStream private jet, but thought better of it with the realization that most of my heroes in auto racing also have their own private jets.
I must admit, however, that there are actually a few good items on the list, such as the iPod (Yes, I'm obsessed with it.), the Blackberry 7105, and the Sony VAIO® FJ notebook PC.
I must also admit a vague curiosity of Hope in a Jar, and Grace (in a basket). I'm thinking, hmm, maybe Faith in a Junk Drawer, or Charity in a Lawn & Leaf Bag. Whaddaya think? Any investors?
This is an excellent, comprehensive list of the best techie products of the year, selected and compiled by PC World Magazine.
While I purposefully try to avoid the Flow of Things Trendy (OK, I admit it didn't work with the iPod.), it's nonetheless heartwarming to see a couple of Mark's Favorite Things (Firefox and Gmail) at the top of this extensive list. Being old school, I'm still confused seeing an Apple OS in the #3 spot on a PC World Best Of list. Yeah, Apple's hardware and software are intriguing, but keep Tiger on a Best of the Mac list, wherever that might be. A Mac is not a PC, dammit. (iTunes also made it to #34 on the list, but that's cross-platform so it makes sense.)
(While I'm familiar with some of the winners, I question, for example, how they could have included the HP OfficeJet 7210 multifunction printer or any HP MFP, for that matter. Excellent and inexpensive hardware, but their software is excessive and painfully problematic for small-business use. Please, PC World: Don't encourage these people.)
PCs and a plethora of peripherals, browser utilities, wireless stuff, websites, software apps, digital cameras, PDAs and even the Vonage VoIP service are among the winners.
Definitely worth some browsing time.
Ebert's Best 10 Movies of 2005
What Best Of list could be reasonably complete without movies? Here are Roger Ebert's picks. Crash (yet another of Oprah's favorites) made the top spot, because " it tells not simple-minded parables, but textured human stories based on paradoxes." Paradoxes are always fun. Syriana and Munich are #2 and #3, respectively. Junebug is #4 (never heard of it) [Ed. Note: It was fantastic, Mark, richly nuanced, haunting. Truly, even the "golden boy," the prodigal son, can never go home again...] and Brokeback Mountain made the #5 spot.
While I gravitate to B-movies with car chases, toilet humor, and a whole lot of objects blowing up ("These are a few of my favorite things "), I was surprised that The Constant Gardener didn't make the list. It's a real movie with a real script and real acting. Check out that one again, Roger.
The Best Web 2.0 Software of 2005
Web 2.0 is still Voodoo to me. It sounds reasonable enough, but I just can't quite wrap my brain around the compelling advantages. Oh well, more reading and studying to do (including an upcoming article here on The Blog.)
Dion Hitchcliffe, in his Web 2.0 blog, says, "It's getting towards the end of the year and I'm feeling the need to take stock of where we've actually come with Web 2.0 in the last 12 months. So much has happened in this space recently and a tidal wave of innovative, high-quality software has been released this year. So much in fact, that it's hard to keep track of it all. While many of us talk about Web 2.0 ideas, there's no substitute for pointing to concrete examples. And this also gives credit where credit is due to all the hard-working folks building the next generation of the Web."
So, Hitchcliffe compiled and comments on 11 Web 2.0 specific software in a variety of different areas, from social bookmarking to blog filters and Web-based word processing.
Interesting reading.
Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in the World
OK, this one's not so light, but it's worth a browse. Manufacturing is alive and well, with such leaders as ABB, Agilent, Alcoa, Eastman Kodak, Heidelberger, HP (!), Intel, Seimens, Toyota, United Technologies, Volkswagen and Volvo achieving Most Sustainable status.
Interestingly, clicking on the Sort by Country selection reveals that Great Britain is apparently leading the world in having the most of the Most Sustainable.
I have a funny relationship with wine. I've been on vineyard tours and to wine tastings, and actually realize that good wine is both art and science. The science of wine is fascinating, but, on the rare occasion that I imbibe, I still prefer vodka. My approach to wine? "The less I like it, the better it is." So far, sadly, this has usually held true.
For our connoisseur readers, however, here's Top 100 Wines 2005 from SFGate.com. Framed with a well-written article, the multiple lists are organized in subcategories of Whites and Reds, of course. Also included is a hearty yet charming article with varietal character, "Five recipes to match the complexities of our 10 favorite wines."
Personally, I'd prefer a Pepsi. But if you enjoy this stuff, have at it.
Probably the most humorous of this particular lot are the 2005 Foot-in-Mouth Awards (also referenced earlier this week in an article here on Industrial Market Trends) from Wired magazine.
Topical and smart with a predictable and enjoyable techie twist, the list includes a wide variety of things were said when someone didn't know the mics were on. For example, "The most embarrassing executive antics of the year came early in 2005, as a tone-deaf, stiff white guy stepped up to the stage at the Consumer Electronics Show and joined Aerosmith front man Steven Tyler in a duet." The guy was Intel chairman Craig Barrett. Now that had to be ugly, even for CES.
Intel made the list not once, not twice, but thrice. "You're obviously from France," said by Intel CEO Paul Ottelini. "This zinger deflects criticism when a reporter with an accent asks why Intel is so far behind Advanced Micro Devices on a dual-core server chip. After the laughter subsides, AMD continues to assault Intel's leadership position."
Regarding the recent Wikipedia scandal (covered here, ironically, on Wikipedia), "fake poster" Brian Chase said, "It was done as a joke that went horribly, horribly wrong." Anticlimactic, as the awards piece mentions, but good reading nonetheless.
An excellent collection of whoops moments.
All joking aside, we at Industrial Market Trends thank you for your attention, patience and comments in our still-young blog effort of 2005. We sincerely wish you and yours a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year.
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://news.thomasnet.com/mt41/mt-tb.cgi/360
|
Advertisement
|
Comment
3 CommentsFathoms of history have probed the depths of high-technology travel, both on and under the sea. Submarines have withstood examination by a myriad of television channels; including the Hitler channel (sorry, The History Channel). Frankly, if I see one more set of eyeballs (of someone long dead) captured by the apparently sucking orifice of a periscope, I'll, well, I'll attack my binoculars, and bury them in the backyard and hold a service in their memory. Let's leave those sweaty, smelly submariners to their greasy depth-charges, and torpedoes and look to the heavens; more to the point - to the commercial heavens.
Airplanes suck. And I don't mean the air that's forced through their jets. I mean: why aren't we putting wings on Greyhound buses, thus, getting it over with, so to speak? Better than that: investors are spending billions on this new five hundred seat plane, when, more easily, they might have suggested driving a hundred, or so, loaded Greyhounds onto C5A's, giving out sheet music imprinted with 'Attack on Entebbe' songs. They might invite walk-on's, as well; persons, who would sit on sleeping bags between the parked buses. Just think, that way, they might break seven hundred . And I mean break.
Have you ever flown to Australia (via New Zealand) starting from the east coast of the U.S.? Thirty hours, my friends; on the plane! And the carriers are turning a million dollars for one round trip! Oh, they are carriers. They carry the diseases of boredom, lost time and erupting pituitary glands - twice in one day. Pituitary's are supposed to fire off at 2:00AM, during sleep, in preparation for waking up the next morning with all adrenalin valves pumping. Carriers leave adrenalin on the the coach-class floor, and in the case of Australia, Zombies exit the plane and have to have coherent conversations with, 'fresh as daisies,' customs agents.
Look, planes have flown since Kitty-hawk, and I won't get started on the poor Frenchman who flew before the Wrights. Surely, that would be wrong (sorry for the passive). Planes work. Short of a hyper-plane, what's the big deal? Yet, passengers pretend their tooth paste, happily sitting in the tube, waiting to exit and serve another set of gritty, scaly teeth for the fairyland.
I call for a new look at planes from the customer's perspective. Let's accept humanity as the genius specie with the terrible social values. "Pile 'em on and push 'em through the system." That's the name of the plane game. I mean, if they want to pack 'em in, make 'em stand all the way, like the 9:30 AM Hoyt Scamerhorn line from Brooklyn to Manhattan. Just think, they might get two million a trip.
I suggest a Thomas issue about ergonomics and socioeconomic engineering. It's time to serve the purchasers of tickets, rather than the ticket sellers.
December 30, 2005 10:32 PM
Scanning with multifunction printers is becoming the norm these days. People can reuse the file or easily print or scan it.
September 14, 2009 4:13 AM


