Quantcast
 
Search for: Search what?
  

 Newsletters
Industry Market Trends
Get our free bi-weekly Industry Market Trends newsletter delivered by e-mail.
Subscribe    View Sample

Product News Alerts
Get customized, daily news on the products and services you want to know about.
Subscribe   View Sample
 Recent Entries
 Archives by Year
 Recommended Reading
book9.25b.JPG

Hardcover, 576pp
Harvard Business Press, October 2008 (Updated and Expanded)
ISBN-13: 978-1422126967
Read more


 Blogroll
Advertisement

« Machine Tools Use Gravity to Tame Vibration | Main | Welding Vs. Brazing »


January 18, 2005

How to Build a Giant Lathe? Combine World War II Relics

By Katrina C. Arabe

A New York shop recently took on an enormous challenge--how to construct a huge lathe that could accommodate long ship shafts. Find out how it made the cut through an unconventional approach:

Machine Tool Research, Inc. (MTR), a special machinery builder and rebuilder, was recently faced with a unique problem. It had to think big--literally--when a supplier of long ship shafts for the U.S. Navy asked for its help. The supplier wanted MTR to assist in building a massive lathe--a machine for shaping a piece of material through rapid rotation along its axis while pressed against a fixed cutting or abrading tool. And it needed the shop to create the giant-sized machine quickly and affordably.

"Our customer presented a difficult challenge that meant all disciplines from engineering to assembly had to work concurrently to meet the tight schedule with a low budget," John Blawski, executive vice president of MTR, tells Modern Applications News. To meet this challenge, MTR took the working parts of several machines and pieced them together, creating a lathe that could outperform the original machines.

The Rochester, NY shop used two World War II vintage Niles lathes, integrating their bed sections in order to build a nearly 100-foot bed for the ship shafts. While MTR found two of the beds had functional hard ways, the third bed's ways were badly damaged, requiring replacement. The shop also machined all three beds to correlate on all guide surfaces for tailstock and carriage on its CNC (computer numerical control) planer mill.

For the headstock and tailstock, the shop turned to a junked Farrel lathe. MTR was able to service its severely worn headstock and tailstock, adapting them to the new bed. What's more, it achieved a 0.0002-inch TRI (total indicated runout) from both parts. Additionally, the builder completely remanufactured the carriage, creating a new cross slide with tool slides to match the work piece. To meet high precision demands, it created a twin-pinion drive for the carriage (Z axis) and a press-loaded ball screw for the cross slide (X axis).

To support the work on this two-way bed machine, MTR drafted and constructed three roller-type rests, which complied with government standards. Meanwhile, the builder found electric components for its lathe in a 1990s vintage Allen-Bradley CNC, which came from the scrapped lathe carcass. The shop then programmed the software to manage the twin-pinion drives.

So far, MTR's creativity has paid off. The machine has cleared inspection at MTR's plant and is slated for a turnkey installation.

Source:

'Monster' Lathe Built From WWII Machines
Modern Applications News, December 2004
www.manufacturingcenter.com/man/articles/1204/1204monster_lathe.asp

| Add to Y!MyWeb | Digg it | Add to Slashdot




Advertisement


Comment

8 Comments

W. S. Gates said:

Adaptive re-use of our industrial heritage! This is where America can continue to compete in the future, but not if we have scrapped all our old machines and built condos in all our old mill buildings. I see potential for an article surveying old machine equipment dealers and listings --how to source and procure old machines.

January 18, 2005 2:17 PM


Sal Romano said:

What happened to all the lathes of this type that were at the Brooklyn Navy Yard?

January 18, 2005 3:12 PM


rhbernstein said:

very interesting, indeed.
but, a few facts/dimensions would be of interest.
you say the bedis almost 100 ft long; but how long a ship's shaft could be worked on, actually? and what "swing" would the rebuilt machine have?

January 19, 2005 11:25 AM


R Segovich said:

This is a very interesting machining challenge, I too would be interested in more info... such as foundation, drive, weight limits and considerations of temperature on such a long bed.
Good reading.

January 19, 2005 1:40 PM




Leave a comment

 












Type the characters you see in the picture above.


 
 


Brought to you by Thomasnet.com        Browse ThomasNet Directory

Copyright © 2009 Thomas Publishing Company
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy