|
|
Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of employers struggling to fill certain positions is at an all-time high, even with severe unemployment, a recent report says. Organizations are looking for increasingly specific skill sets and taking longer to fill job vacancies, yet the shifting job market requires a new way for employers to address how they fill positions.
| Related Stories |
| Global Jobs Outlook: Cautious Hiring Despite “Talent Shortage” |
| Make or Buy Hot Talent? |
| Attracting Talent Among Top Procurement Challenges |
Despite the slow and uneven economic recovery, along with lingering high unemployment, many organizations around the world continue to report they cannot find the talent they need when they need it. Globally, one in three (34 percent) employers reports experiencing difficulties filling positions due to lack of available talent, according to ManpowerGroup’s 2011 annual Talent Shortage Survey of nearly 40,000 employers in 39 countries and territories.
Released this summer, ManpowerGroup’s research reveals that employers in the United States, China, Germany and India report the most dramatic talent shortage surges compared to last year.
Based on responses from more than 1,300 U.S. employers, 52 percent of U.S. employers are experiencing difficulty filling mission-critical positions within their organizations, up from 14 percent in 2010.
In the U.S., the top 10 hardest jobs to fill were: skilled trades; sales representatives; engineers; drivers; accounting and finance staff; IT staff; management; teachers; secretaries/administrative assistants; and machinists/machine operators.
Globally, nine of this year’s top 10 hard-to-fill jobs — including technicians, skilled-trade workers, engineers, laborers and production operators — also appeared on last year’s list, and nine of the same 10 positions were also proving problematic for employers to fill in 2006, the first year Manpower’s survey was conducted.
Why have these jobs perennially been on the list? According to Manpower’s findings, the answer is simple: The jobs have changed, as have the skills required to perform them.
“As we know from the persistently high unemployment rate, job seekers are plentiful, but employers are engaged in an ongoing struggle to fill positions,” Jonas Prising, ManpowerGroup president of the Americas, said in a statement. “Ultimately, the underlying reason for this gap between available talent and desired talent is simple: jobs have structurally changed over time, and the skills needed to fulfill these roles have, too.”
Approximately three-quarters of employers worldwide cited a lack of experience, skills or knowledge as the primary reason for the difficulty filling positions. However, only one in five employers is concentrating on training and development to fill the gap. Merely 6 percent of employers are working more closely with educational institutions to create curriculums that close knowledge gaps.
“The fact that companies cite a lack of skills or experience as a reason for talent shortages should be a wake-up call for employers, academia, government and individuals,” according to Prising. “It is imperative that these stakeholders work together to address the supply-and-demand imbalance in the labor market in a systematic, agile and sustainable way.”
There may also be an increasing imbalance between employers’ willingness to pay higher salaries in what is still a soft general labor market compared to the salary expectations of prospective employees, especially those with skills that are in high demand.
Compensation in manufacturing has stagnated over the past decade, even as the median cost of replacing employees in the manufacturing sector is $5,000 per employee, compared with $3,000 per employee in other sectors, according to a 2010 report by the Sloan Center on Aging at Boston College.
Beyond cost, manufacturers face the challenge of transferring knowledge to the next generation of employees.
What can employers do to navigate this complex and challenging landscape?
According to Manpower’s findings, employers are already using a range of strategies to overcome the difficulties they face in finding the right talent, at the right time, in the right place. Realizing the importance of retaining mission-critical talent, they are more focused on staff retention, taking a “one size fits one” approach to training and development, tailoring it to the individual and helping to build the specific skills needed for business growth.
Along with its Talent Shortage Survey findings, ManpowerGroup published a paper titled Manufacturing Talent for the Human Age, which makes recommendations for how employers should address talent scarcity in the face of an abundance of available workers.
Suggestions include adopting a holistic workforce strategy, updating work models and people practices to reflect the realities of the 21st century and collaborating with governments, academia and individuals.
“Employers must reconsider their work models and people practices, and develop a robust workforce strategy that in a sense ‘manufactures’ the talent they need to execute their long-term business strategy,” the paper states. “Sticking to old assumptions on how to structure and organize work, how to develop and incent talent, and where to source it, will leave businesses in peril.”
Manpower makes clear that the “manufacturing” of talent is not an overnight process. It takes time to develop, and companies must strategize accordingly.
“[E]mployers must adopt long-term workforce strategies aligned with their business strategy to replace ‘just in time’ hiring as their main focus, as ‘on-demand’ talent will simply no longer be available,” Manpower states. “The solution is to think more long term about talent and how to ‘manufacture’ it by implementing a workforce strategy that effectively forecasts the needs of the business, the talent required to achieve their goals, and where they can find it. They must also be more innovative and flexible in terms of developing the talent they need.”
Resources
2011 Talent Shortage Survey Results
ManpowerGroup, May 2011
…More than Half of U.S. Employers Cannot Find the Right Talent for Open Positions
ManpowerGroup, May 19, 2011
‘Manufacturing’ Talent for the Human Age
ManpowerGroup, May 2011
Talent Pressures and the Aging Workforce: Manufacturing Sector
by Stephen Sweet and Marcie Pitt-Catsouphes with Elyssa Besen, Shoghik Hovhannisyan and Farooq Pasha
Sloan Center on Aging (Boston College), June 2010
40 Percent of Fleets are Affected by Driver Shortages
Material Handling & Logistics, Aug. 11, 2011











Browse IMT by Date
Browse IMT by Date



In response to the article, I am trying to address the skills gap problem by starting an Advanced Manufacturing training facility in North East Ohio.
The school will be a non- profit competency-based facility. Students are expected to demonstrate mastery of the subject before they are considered done with the course, no matter how long it takes to accomplish the task. We will accept as few as one student per class to a maximum of twelve. Most students will need to be sponsored and recommended by an employer. Industry will drive whatever is to be taught. We will build a curriculum for any manufacturing-related task- including the machining, fabricating, forming, welding, extruding and mold making sectors as well as quality control, entrepreneurial and soft skills.
I am hoping to catch the eyes of my local industrial base and hope they will embrace what I am attempting to do and put their full support behind making it a reality.
I had a lot of trouble understanding the last three paragraphs of the report. If I am transalating correctly, I think you are saying that employers need to be prepared to train their own personnel. A lot of employers have lost track of that. In the day, people started at the bottom and found out, as their employers did, what they were good at by doing. The one big benefit of that is an employer can train what he wants. You want a certain type of driver, then train him/her/it that way.