Advertisement
Policy Changes Proposed for Renewed Manufacturing

Three new reports from industry trade groups and the government reaffirm the importance of manufacturing to the U.S. economy and highlight policy and investment actions to tackle rising challenges.



Recent reports make the case that manufacturing can lead the United States into a renewed era of growth through changes to economic and tax policies as well as investment.

This week, the Milken Institute released Jobs for America: Investments and Policies for Economic Growth and Competitiveness, which analyzes job creation possibilities through policy and investment actions.

Specifically, the strategies include: reducing corporate tax rates, increasing and making permanent the research and development (R&D) tax credit; and modernizing export controls on certain products.

“With unemployment at 10 percent, the question on the minds of all policymakers is how to create jobs,” Ross DeVol, executive director of economic research at the Milken Institute and lead author of the study, said in a statement.

Another new report, from the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the Council of Manufacturing Associations (CMA), reaffirms the importance of manufacturing to the U.S. economy and the job market, but points out some mounting challenges for the future success of the industry.

“America’s capacity to generate wealth and long-term economic growth and jobs depends on the enactment of federal policies that encourage manufacturing innovation, productivity and competitiveness,” NAM President John Engler said in an announcement of the report.

Released last week, NAM and CMA’s Manufacturing Resurgence – A Must for U.S. Prosperity recommends numerous strategies to create manufacturing jobs and stimulate manufacturing innovation and productivity, including:

  • Reduce the corporate income tax rate to match those of major trading partners.
  • Make the R&D tax credit permanent;
  • Make policy decisions now to guide private-sector R&D investment toward clean-energy technologies;
  • Improve the U.S. education system, especially science, technology, engineering and math fields;
  • Support small business viability by widening the lowest corporate income tax bracket; and
  • Invest in all levels of infrastructure.

Study co-author Joel Popkin cited the erosion of U.S. leadership in R&D in particular as a major challenge facing domestic manufacturers.

“The U.S. is still the leader in the absolute number of dollars spent. Its strong R&D position, however, is being eroded by the impact of the economic downturn and the rapidly expanding R&D programs in other countries,” Popkin said. “When the data is available, we expect to see the U.S. share of world R&D fell in 2009.”

Basic research is fundamental to any nation’s economic growth, but this imperative is easier to act on in good economic times than in difficult ones.

According to a third recent report, from the Obama administration, manufacturing is responsible for 70 percent of all research and development spending in U.S. industry, yet the U.S. devotes less than 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) to R&D, “a ration that is exceeded by a number of countries, including Japan, Sweden, Switzerland, South Korea, Iceland and Israel.”

The government’s American Recovery & Reinvestment Act included the largest increase in R&D funding in the nation’s history, a total of more than $18 billion. “The impact of U.S. stimulus funding on total R&D in 2009 and 2010 cannot be underestimated; without it, total U.S. R&D would have dropped below 2008 levels,” according to Battelle and R&D Magazine.

The Battelle/R&D 2010 Global R&D Funding Forecast, released last month, projects that U.S. R&D spending will increase by 3.3 percent in 2010, rising to $401.9 billion.

While most agree that sustained R&D investment is crucial to economic growth, the R&D tax credit — which historically provided more security for private-sector decisions to undertake R&D and, as a result, helped spur innovation and economic growth — was allowed to expire on Dec. 31, 2009.

“For businesses, the lapsing of the R&D credit — a $7 billion a year break — is a particular problem, since companies must plan for long-term research commitments amid uncertainty,” Forbes reports. “Since its enactment in 1981, the credit has been extended 13 times; in the mid-1990s there was a one-year gap when it wasn’t extended retroactively.”

With a permanent extension of the credit, companies could count on the credit throughout the term of their multi-year R&D projects, the R&D Credit Coalition says. “Uncertainty regarding the availability of the credit automatically results in companies discounting its value.”

Moreover, establishing a permanent R&D tax credit and increasing it by 25 percent could boost real GDP by more than $206 billion (1.2 percent) and generate 316,000 manufacturing jobs by 2019, according to the NAM/Milken Institute study.

“To remain strong players in a competitive world, U.S. manufacturers need government policies that encourage continued innovation and productivity gains,” according to William E. Gaskin, president of the Precision Metalforming Association and former CMA chair. “In particular, we need policies that encourage public and private investments to enhance productivity, such as those in R&D, capital goods, worker training and early education that nurtures math and science proficiency.”

Resources

Jobs for America: Investments and Policies for Economic Growth and Competitiveness
by Ross DeVol, Perry Wong, Armen Bedroussian, Anita Charuworn, Anusuya Chatterjee, Candice Flor Hynek, Kevin Klowden and Benjamin Yeo
The Milken Institute, Jan. 26, 2010

Millions of Jobs Could Be Created with Policy Changes and with New Infrastructure Investment…
The Milken Institute, Jan. 26, 2010

Manufacturing is Essential for Economic Growth and Prosperity but Faces Big Challenges…
The National Association of Manufacturers and the Council of Manufacturing Associations, Jan. 21, 2010

Manufacturing Resurgence – A Must for U.S. Prosperity
by Joel Popkin and Kathryn Kobe
The National Association of Manufacturers and the Council of Manufacturing Associations, Jan. 21, 2010

A Framework for Revitalizing American Manufacturing
U.S. National Economic Council, Dec. 16, 2009

Stimulus Funding Leads to U.S. Rebound in 2010…
Battelle and R&D Magazine, Dec. 22, 2009

2010 Global R&D Funding Forecast
by Martin Grueber and Tim Studt
Battelle and R&D Magazine, Dec. 22, 2009

Congress Lets 50 Tax Breaks Expire
by Ashlea Ebeling
Forbes, Dec. 22, 2009

The Research & Development Credit – Creating Jobs, Growing America’s Economy
R&D Credit Coalition, Jan. 20, 2010

Share

Email  | Print  | Post Comment  | Follow Discussion  | Recommend  |  Recommended (0)

 
Comments:
  • January 27, 2010

    Our government was caught sleeping at the wheel. Its hard to believe that someone in the halls of government did not see this coming.

    Our manufacturing capablility and capacity is in nothing but a shell of its former self. How are we to compete against countries that have no employee protections and governments that subsidize there operations to artificially keep prices down built into their programs. Allowing huge American corporations to avoid paying Americans to produce parts/items/subassemblies to be assembled in their respective widgets is downright unAmerican. And any company that sends this work off shore, to countries simply because it does not want to pay American wages, should have to pay a huge penalty.

    I hope, one day, people from countries like China and many others will wake up and demand higher pay and better working conditions, sound familiar. The net effect being higher prices on goods coming out of China and the other countries and eventually a more level playing field. How long until this takes is anybody’s guess, but I believe it will happen, someday.


  • Pete, Murray Hill, NJ
    January 28, 2010

    JackT is correct. Companies do nothing as citizens. Management look out for themselves. As a country, we made a big mistake entering into agreements like NAFTA,GATT, etc. They do nothing for the citizens of the USA, except make it easier for companies to import goods made at slave wages. If Obama wanted to accomplish something, abolshing these agreements would be a good place to start. He will not do this becasue the people who give him and others money will not let him.

    Jack, people in and out of government saw this coming but did nothing becasue there was something in it for them to ignore this issue.


Leave a Comment:

Your Comment:




CAPTCHA Image

[ Different Image ]

Press Releases
Resources
Home  |  My ThomasNet News®  |  Industry Market Trends  |  Submit Release  |  Advertise  |  Contact News  |  About Us
Brought to you by Thomasnet.com        Browse ThomasNet Directory

Copyright © 2012 Thomas Publishing Company
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy






Bear
Thank you for commenting close

Your comment has been received and held for approval by the blog owner.
Error close

Please enter a valid email address