Advertisement
Dirtiest Fossil Fuel the Future’s ‘Cleanest’?

Coal, the dirtiest of fossil fuels, has been vilified for years. Yet researchers have been making progress in limiting the pollutants it emits. Now coal is seeing a resurgence in attention, mostly due to the technologies attempting to make coal cleaner.



Coal is one of the oldest fuels in humanity. But it’s also one of the dirtiest. It powered our Industrial Revolution, then we learned that burning it releases greenhouse gases that have been linked by scientists to negative climate change. As such, it has suffered a decade-long slide and been vilified for emitting pollutants such as nitrogen oxides, mercury and sulfur into the air.

It has also played an increasingly larger role in meeting the world’s energy needs ever since. Now this dirty little fossil fuel continues to gain a renaissance of attention.
A hopper of coal is on display outside a mine.jpg

The major advantage of coal is that there is so much of it, enough to last the world for another 200-300 years at current rates of consumption, which makes it incredibly economical. And the U.S. has more coal than any other country in the world — about one quarter of the world’s reserves. Further, its competition has weaknesses that can be exploited: natural gas, albeit with significantly lower emissions and capital cost, has seen upward-moving prices of late; meanwhile, renewable energy sources remain inadequate as a large-scale source of electricity; and nuclear energy continues to possess numerous stigmas.

Perhaps the most important reason for coal’s resurgence are the technologies attempting to make coal burn cleaner to recover waste coal, major efforts of which promise greater environmental benefit. Researchers already have made progress in limiting emissions in recent years. For example, about 98 percent of sulfur can now be removed from emissions, according to Gordon Couch, a technologist with the International Energy Agency’s Clean Coal Centre in London, reports National Geographic this month.

Yet coal combustion continues to produce large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2), the major greenhouse gas considered a chief cause of climate change. Beyond its effects on human health, burning coal produces twice as much CO2 as natural gas, according to Harvard Magazine’s May-June 2006 cover article. Hence the long-term goal of clean-coal research of zero-CO2 emissions.

For instance, many researchers hope to turn coal into clean natural gas. The concept isn’t new. Cities in the 1800s used massive, dirty ovens to turn coal into town gas to fuel streetlights and gas lamps in homes. During WWII, Nazi Germany turned coal into liquid fuel for tanks. The U.S. government even promoted research projects to produce gas and liquid fuel from coal during the 1970s energy crisis, efforts later abandoned after the crisis passed.

Take Greatpoint Energy, for example. The Cambridge, Mass.-based company is refining a process called catalytic gasification to convert coal into methane or substitute natural gas, says NPR. In the process, “coal is mixed with a catalyst and fed into a gasifier: a tall, narrow, metal cylindrical container.” The coal and catalyst are combined with steam and subjected to pressure inside the gasifier, thus causing a chemical reaction that converts them into carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Further, the catalyst enables the company to separate out about half of the CO2. It works at a lower temperature than other technologies, which makes the process much cheaper.

As well, the Fischer-Tropsch process — a nearly century-old chemical technique for converting coal into liquid fuels — has been improved significantly. Researchers can shuffle the carbon atoms derived from cheap fuel sources — such as coal — to form more desirable combinations such as ethane gas and diesel fuel, according to a study in last month’s journal Science (via National Geographic). Scientists scrambled the makeup of hydrocarbons using two chemical processes (one of which earned last year’s Nobel Prize in chemistry). The reaction produced ethane gas and diesel fuel. Rutgers University chemist Alan Goldman says the synthetic diesel is “much cleaner burning than conventional diesel, even cleaner burning than gasoline.” The technology has the potential to one day wring more diesel fuel and ethane gas from hydrocarbon byproducts produced by oil refineries.
coal plant.jpg

In March, the world’s largest prototype carbon-capture coal plant opened in Denmark. Researchers there aim to develop new types of solvents that can be used to trap CO2 and convert it into a solid form as carbon. The gas is washed with a liquid solvent, then compressed and put down a hole. The idea is to improve the capture rate of CO2. New solvents and carbon-capture techniques developed at the plant will also be cheaper and more energy efficient than those currently available.

The plant’s goal is to develop technology that will allow the European Union (EU) to capture and store 10 percent of its total carbon dioxide emissions and 30 percent of the CO2 produced by conventional power stations.

However, the “front-runner” of next-generation clean-coal technology is coal gasification, in which both steam and oxygen are used to turn coal into a synthetic gas that primarily consists of hydrogen. The gas is then combusted to generate electricity. This gas gives off greater concentrations of CO2 than combusted coal, thus making the emitted gas easier to trap.

The captured CO2 is sequestered by directing it into underground reservoirs where engineers anticipate that it will remain buried forever. The CO2 can also be pumped into oil and gas formations to help push the fuel to the surface. In doing this, Audis says, we can actually recover more oil and gas, as the CO2 can be used to force them out of the ground.

Plants that implement this two-part engineering solution — gasification and underground burial — are more efficient than traditional plants and can be engineered to produce a variety of liquid and gaseous fuels, including methanol, diesel, hydrogen and natural gas (methane).

So, could humanity’s oldest and dirtiest fossil fuel one day be our “cleanest” fuel? What are your thoughts?

References

Clean Coal? New Technology Buries Greenhouse Emissions
by James Owen
National Geographic News, May 2, 2006

Fueling Our Future
by Jonathan Shaw
Harvard Magazine, May-June 2006

Turning Dirty Coal into Clean Energy
by Elizabeth Shogren
NPR Morning Edition, April 25, 2006

The End of Oil? Breakthrough Turns Coal Into Clean Diesel
by Sean Markey
National Geographic News, April 18, 2006

Simpler and Cheaper Clean Coal Technology
by Peter Fairley
MIT Technology Review, April 26, 2006

Share

Email  | Print  | Post Comment  | Follow Discussion  | Recommend  |  Recommended (0)

 
Comments:
  • May 23, 2006

    Pressurized fluidized bed at AEP Cardinal Plant proved successful. Government funding dictated the generation be offset during operation and the plant be dismantled after conceptual operation.

    Atmospheric Fluidized Bed likewise was successfully operated by TVA in a Unit 3 Plant in Kentucky.

    Corn ethanol at Muscle Shoals, Alabama, proved successful. TVA dismantled the stainless steel facility and noted ethanol was not profitable when gasoline prices were below $1.00 per gallon.

    AEP Unit 3 Clinch River Plant demonstrated pulverized coal combustion with less pollution, less carbon monoxide, less carbon dioxide, less NOx than natural gas. The concept was simple. Precisely control the fuel/air mixture and flame temperature with 15-30% increase in generation.
    A moonshine expert quit running from the law and was hired by TVA for expertise at the ethanol plant in Alabama.
    Canalis LLC was hired to precisely measure the air flow at AEP Clinch River Plant.

    Folks, the big utilities make more money selling pollution credits than from selling electricity. Clean technology cost less than expending energy to create pollution.

    No music has been sung about the Ohio plant under German direction cleaned up coal combustion by adding corn.

    Whole kernel shelled corn fuel is the low cost clean safe Tennessee corn stove heating fuel in existance.

    Tennessee corn stoves are readily available in quantities limited only by production capability. Tennessee corn stoves exist because they gets no government funding, no tax breaks, pays they own way, and because they is the second best kept secret is world history. Environmental pollution in Tennessee would be cut in half immediately if all homes in Tennessee were heated with corn fuel.


  • May 24, 2006

    I’m still very skeptical about the CO2 reservoir concept. Where does the reservoir come from? Does it have to be built, or is it the re-use of abandoned mines or wells? How will engineers guarantee against massive accidental release from breach of reservoirs? We should be as equally doubtful of this as we are to burying radioactive waste from nuclear power plants.

    I remain convinced that the future is nuclear generation of electricity for our power needs, using alternatives like coal as a bridge to a better engineered, constructed, and managed design for nuclear generation plants. It sounds crazy, but I have always thought we should send spent fuel off planet by rockets to orbit or burn in the sun’s vicinity. I really don’t think the chances of catastrophic accident of that are much greater than the chances of radioactive leakage from burying it in a mountain somewhere.


Leave a Comment:

Your Comment:




CAPTCHA Image

[ Different Image ]

Press Releases
Resources
Home  |  My ThomasNet News®  |  Industry Market Trends  |  Submit Release  |  Advertise  |  Contact News  |  About Us
Brought to you by Thomasnet.com        Browse ThomasNet Directory

Copyright © 2012 Thomas Publishing Company
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy






Bear
Thank you for commenting close

Your comment has been received and held for approval by the blog owner.
Error close

Please enter a valid email address