Advertisement
Beyond Oil: The View from Hubbert’s Peak
by Kenneth S. Deffeyes
Beyond Oil

Geologist Kenneth S. Deffeyes, who was among the first to warn of the coming oil crisis, turns his attention to the earth’s supply of potential replacement fuels. In Beyond Oil, he traces their likely production futures using the analytic tools developed by pioneering petroleum-supply authority M. King Hubbert.


Hardcover, 224pp
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, March 2005
ISBN-13: 0809029561
Barnes & Noble online price: $19.20
Get This Book Now

SYNOPSIS

FROM THE PUBLISHER

“Kenneth S. Deffeyes, a geologist who was among the first to warn of the coming oil crisis, now takes the next logical step and turns his attention to the earth’s supply of potential replacement fuels. In Beyond Oil, he traces out their likely production futures, with special reference to that of oil, using the same analytic tools developed by his former colleague, the pioneering petroleum-supply authority M. King Hubbert.” The book includes chapters on natural gas, coal, tar sands and heavy oil, oil shale, uranium, and (although not strictly an energy resource itself) hydrogen. A concluding chapter on the overall energy picture covers the likely mix of energy sources the world can rely on for the near-term future, and the special roles that will need to be played by conservation, high-mileage diesel automobiles, nuclear power plants, and wind-generated electricity.

FROM THE CRITICS

Kirkus Reviews
The world is running on empty, warns petroleum geologist Deffeyes (Hubbert’s Peak, 2001), and yet Humvees continue to roll down the assembly lines, roads to be built, and economic models to be churned out. Hubbert’s Peak refers not to an oil-implicated place along the lines of Kuwait or Teapot Dome, but to a statistical concept hatched in the 1950s by another geologist, M. King Hubbert: it posits that world oil production over time will follow the classic bell curve, the apex of which took place in the past. Tinkering with Hubbert’s math just a little, Deffeyes projects that the end of 2005 will see total oil production at 2.013 trillion barrels, adding, “Wherever the peak, the view is not good.” He adds, provocatively, that Thanksgiving of that year ought to be designated World Oil Peak Day and that we use the occasion to give thanks to the years 1901 to 2004, when oil was abundant and cheap. Stopgap measures will not help, he offers: drilling the five billion barrels locked up in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, as the Bush administration has been thirsting to do for years, will only “postpone the world decline for two or three months.” What, then, is to be done? Well, Deffeyes suggests, we can always try to capitalize by buying into an oil royalty trust. More to the point, governments can develop coal and nuclear energy generators in the short term, polluting and potentially hazardous though they may be, while looking for longer-term solutions with a sense of urgency behind them. And ordinary consumers can learn to turn off lights, eat foods that don’t require tons of pesticides and shipping far distances out of season, and stop buying gas-guzzlers-or, as Deffeyes growls, departingfrom his friendly college-lecture style, “find some other way of publicizing your testosterone.” A timely, compelling argument that should make owners of hybrid cars just a little bit happier, and everyone else very glum indeed.

Buy now and get an additional 5% off as a Thomas user.

Share

Email  | Print  | Post Comment  | Follow Discussion  | Recommend  |  Recommended (0)

Advertisement

Dean Pump - The Leader in High Temperature Industrial Process Pumps
Comments:
  • Jim
    October 25, 2005

    I still can not belive that even this man can write a book and not touch on Agro-fuels, such as Bio-Diesel (from soybeans) and Ethanol (from corn).


  • Bob Brown
    October 25, 2005

    As James Kunstler points out in his book “The Long Emergency,…..” the problem with many so-called alternative fuel sources is that their production is very dependent on petroleum for their production. Think diesel fuel to run the tractor and natural gas to provide nitrogen fertilizers. There is a net loss of energy in most instances. The same can be said for solar and wind. The tools needed to produce and store these energy sources are very dependent on petroleum for their production. We may be closer to using technologies that were familiar to our ancestors than we care to think. There don’t seem to be any large-scale efficient energy sources on the near horizon.


Leave a Comment:

Your Comment:




CAPTCHA Image

[ Different Image ]

Press Releases
Resources
Home  |  My ThomasNet News®  |  Industry Market Trends  |  Submit Release  |  Advertise  |  Contact News  |  About Us
Brought to you by Thomasnet.com        Browse ThomasNet Directory

Copyright © 2012 Thomas Publishing Company
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy






Bear
Thank you for commenting close

Your comment has been received and held for approval by the blog owner.
Error close

Please enter a valid email address